Teams

DIAMOND HILLS 55AM7.0A

2025 ADULT 55&Over · Men 7.0

14 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
L#1 DoublesAlexander Macksoud / Edwin Matabuena vs Dennis Ciriaco / Christopher Hanford3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesWilliam Burns / Steve Grimm vs Roland Ramos / Wayne Spencer5-7, 5-7
L#3 DoublesSean Krepp / Eduardo Zerbini vs Gil Fuentes / John Ard1-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Men 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.25 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.55
Joel Belangdal
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.50
Moses Reyes
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.47
Steve Grimm
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.43
Ernesto Sioson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.20
Cesar Lozano
published 3.5
3.20
Alexander Macksoud
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.97
Eduardo Zerbini
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.67
John Honaker
published
Edwin Matabuena
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Gerard Rose
published
Jason Jefferson
published
John Bahns
published
Matt Pierce
published
Sean Krepp
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Joel Belangdal + Moses Reyes314 matchesnot enough data
John Honaker + Joel Belangdal033 matchesnot enough data
Ernesto Sioson + Eduardo Zerbini033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Joel Belangdal
11W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%36%64%
3.55
Moses Reyes
17W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%51%49%
3.50
Steve Grimm
22W–18L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%58%42%
3.47
Ernesto Sioson
3W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
69%31%<1%
3.43
3.5
Cesar Lozano
9W–12L career · no lines in 2025
8%91%2%
3.20
3.5
Alexander Macksoud
9W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
8%91%2%
3.20
Eduardo Zerbini
15W–20L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%57%43%
2.97
John Honaker
11W–12L career · no lines in 2025
11%88%1%
2.67
Edwin Matabuena
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Gerard Rose
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Jason Jefferson
5W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
John Bahns
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Matt Pierce
2W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Sean Krepp
0W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.