Teams

BC-LLW-SealBeach/KathyZapeda

2025 Adult 65 & Over - Beach Cities · BC Women - 8.0

12 players · average NTRP 4.06 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-10-04vs BC-AltaVista/MichelleAlfordWon 10
W#2 DoublesTerri Hamm / Julie Lessley vs Beverly Johnston / Anne Hirata6-0, 6-3
2025-09-14Won 10
W#2 DoublesMary DeVlugt / Julie Lessley vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-09-07vs BC-AltaVista/MichelleAlfordSplit 11
W#1 DoublesLisa Kusayanagi / Eileen Kaiser vs Beverly Johnston / Denise Vega6-7, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesDeborah Fitzgerald / Paula Nishibayashi vs Iris Cox / Randi Young0-6, 6-7
2025-08-24vs BC-AltaVista/MichelleAlfordWon 10
W#2 DoublesNikki Nance / Paula Nishibayashi vs Victoria Alsina / Colleen Johnson6-4, 1-4
2025-08-17vs BC-AltaVista/MichelleAlfordWon 20
W#1 DoublesDeborah Fitzgerald / Julie Lessley vs Teresa Campbell / Anne Hirata6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesNikki Nance / Paula Nishibayashi vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-08-10vs BC-AltaVista/MichelleAlfordWon 10
W#1 DoublesEileen Kaiser / Lisa Kusayanagi vs Susan Raifman / Victoria Alsina6-1, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for BC Women - 8.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.76 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.03
Caridad Coto
published 4.5
3.83
Eileen Kaiser
published 4
3.82
Julie Lessley
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.80
3.79
Christy Akin
published 4
3.76
Terri Hamm
published
3.72
Lisa Kusayanagi
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.70
Brenda Danielson
published 4
3.69
Deborah Fitzgerald
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.66
Mary DeVlugt
published
3.57
Paula Nishibayashi
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
Nikki Nance
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Deborah Fitzgerald + Julie Lessley6256% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Caridad Coto
1W–14L career · no lines in 2025
41%59%<1%
4.03
4
Eileen Kaiser
19W–17L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%9%
3.83
4
Julie Lessley
95W–64L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%91%8%
3.82
Kathy Zepeda Emerzian
10W–4L career · no lines in 2025
1%93%6%
3.80
4
Christy Akin
3W–1L career · no lines in 2025
1%93%6%
3.79
Terri Hamm
7W–10L career · no lines in 2025
2%94%3%
3.76
4
Lisa Kusayanagi
46W–42L career · 2 lines in 2025
4%94%2%
3.72
4
Brenda Danielson
5W–5L career · no lines in 2025
6%93%1%
3.70
4
Deborah Fitzgerald
178W–201L career · 2 lines in 2025
7%92%1%
3.69
Mary DeVlugt
16W–14L career · no lines in 2025
11%88%<1%
3.66
4
Paula Nishibayashi
92W–73L career · 3 lines in 2025
29%71%<1%
3.57
Nikki Nance
7W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.