Teams

Singles Social Club 4.0W Singles

2023 Howard Columbia Singles · Howard Columbia Singles 4.0 Women

5 players · average NTRP 4.12 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2023-10-20vs Lonely Artists Guild 4.0W SinglesWon 21
W#1 SinglesBrooke Schetgen vs Kim Dowd6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesSandra Kick vs Madison Simmons6-4, 6-1
L#3 SinglesManeesha Ahluwalia vs Christine Alewine4-6, 3-6
2023-10-16vs Lonely Artists Guild 4.0W SinglesLost 01
L#3 SinglesManeesha Ahluwalia vs Madison Simmons0-6, 3-6
2023-10-11vs Lonely Artists Guild 4.0W SinglesWon 10
W#2 SinglesManeesha Ahluwalia vs Sara Orthwein6-2, 1-6, 1-0
2023-10-08vs Lonely Artists Guild 4.0W SinglesLost 01
L#1 SinglesManeesha Ahluwalia vs Kim Dowd2-6, 0-6
2023-10-03Won 10
W#3 SinglesEboni Lance vs Jill Rose7-6, 1-2
2023-09-30vs Lonely Artists Guild 4.0W SinglesSplit 11
L#1 SinglesSandra Kick vs Kim Dowd4-6, 3-6
W#3 SinglesBrooke Schetgen vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-09-22vs Lonely Artists Guild 4.0W SinglesSplit 11
L#1 SinglesManeesha Ahluwalia vs Jill Rose1-6, 5-7
W#2 SinglesEboni Lance vs Christine Alewine6-0, 6-3
2023-09-16vs Lonely Artists Guild 4.0W SinglesSplit 11
L#2 SinglesSandra Kick vs Christine Alewine4-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#3 SinglesBrooke Schetgen vs Tina Halley6-2, 6-0
2023-09-10vs Lonely Artists Guild 4.0W SinglesSplit 11
W#2 SinglesSandra Kick vs Kelsey Forbes6-1, 6-3
L#3 SinglesBrooke Schetgen vs Sara Orthwein4-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Howard Columbia Singles 4.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.92 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.38
Eboni Lance
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published 4.5
4.38
Vicki Williamson
published
3.67
Sandra Kick
usually #2 Singles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 4
3.64
Brooke Schetgen
usually #3 Singles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 4
3.53
Maneesha Ahluwalia
usually #3 Singles 44%, also #1 Singles 44% · published 4
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Eboni Lance + Maneesha Ahluwalia4354% gamesnot enough data
Eboni Lance + Vicki Williamson213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Eboni Lance
357W–214L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%81%19%
4.38
Vicki Williamson
44W–41L career · no lines in 2023
<1%81%18%
4.38
4
Sandra Kick
97W–89L career · 4 lines in 2023
10%89%1%
3.67
4
Brooke Schetgen
70W–75L career · 4 lines in 2023
14%85%<1%
3.64
4
Maneesha Ahluwalia
121W–124L career · 9 lines in 2023
42%58%<1%
3.53

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.