Teams

Lumley

2024 Combo 18 & Over-SW · Women 6.5

10 players · average NTRP 3.50 / MISSISSIPPI

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2024-09-29vs FitlifeLost 02
L#1 DoublesCortney Hodges / Mary Lindsey Lumley vs Brooklyn Schmidt / Courtney Griffin6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesMeredith Miller / Kari Lambert vs Robin Kuntz / Melanie Carruth7-5, 3-6, 0-1
2024-09-09vs FitlifeWon 21
L#1 DoublesAlex Lea / Courtney Owens vs Brooklyn Schmidt / Courtney Griffin3-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesMeredith Miller / Laura Murray vs Haley King / Robin Kuntz6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesMary Lindsey Lumley / Ginny Misner vs Mikki Respess / Stacey Cazayoux6-3, 6-4
2024-09-04vs FitlifeWon 21
L#1 DoublesMeredith Miller / Courtney Owens vs Brooklyn Schmidt / Courtney Griffin4-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesMary Lindsey Lumley / Amber James vs Tanya Byrd / Janell Weekley2-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#3 DoublesCortney Hodges / Megan Case vs Kasie Holmes / Melanie Carruth6-0, 6-2
2024-09-03vs FitlifeWon 21
W#1 DoublesAlex Lea / Courtney Owens vs Stacey Cazayoux / Robin Kuntz6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesMegan Case / Laura Murray vs Courtney Griffin / Brooklyn Schmidt6-7, 2-6
W#3 DoublesKimberly McNeese / Sarah Reynolds vs Tanya Byrd / Mikki Respess6-3, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · Women 6.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Lumley31751186
2Fitlife135716119

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.35 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Alex Lea
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.72
Megan Case
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.64
Kimberly McNeese
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.58
Mary Lindsey Lumley
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.29
Courtney Owens
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.00
Cortney Hodges
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.87
Sarah Reynolds
published
Ginny Misner
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Kari Lambert
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Meredith Miller
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Courtney Owens + Cortney Hodges4451% games+4.2% vs expected
Meredith Miller + Alex Lea314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Alex Lea
16W–6L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Megan Case
15W–3L career · 2 lines in 2024
4%94%2%
3.72
Kimberly McNeese
10W–7L career · 1 line in 2024
15%85%<1%
3.64
Mary Lindsey Lumley
26W–13L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%27%73%
3.58
3.5
Courtney Owens
26W–14L career · 3 lines in 2024
1%94%5%
3.29
3.5
Cortney Hodges
18W–15L career · 2 lines in 2024
51%49%<1%
3.00
Sarah Reynolds
3W–0L career · no lines in 2024
<1%84%16%
2.87
3
Ginny Misner
4W–5L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
Kari Lambert
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
Meredith Miller
18W–9L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.