Teams

SD 3.5WD Barnes TC/ Figueroa

2025 SoCal Fall Doubles- SD WD · SD - Women - 3.5

10 players · average NTRP 3.30 / SAN DIEGO

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-11-06vs SD 3.5WD Coronado TC/ HackworthWon 10
W#1 DoublesNoelia Figueroa / Maria Salas Kazmi vs Rebecca Strobel / Cece Klos6-0, 6-2
2025-10-30vs SD 3.5WD Coronado TC/ WestWon 10
W#1 DoublesMaria Salas Kazmi / Noelia Figueroa vs Debora Rozen / Yvonne Hwang4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2025-10-23vs SD 3.5WD Balboa TC/ MalloryLost 01
L#2 DoublesGuadalupe Acosta / Natalia Lombrozo vs Whitney Johnson / Mer Chiodo3-6, 7-5, 0-1
2025-10-16vs SD 3.5WD SDTRC/ MonzonLost 01
L#2 DoublesMARTHA OVIEDO / Guadalupe Acosta vs Ana Mariela Gamiz / Mary Garvey1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesNoelia Figueroa / Guadalupe Acosta vs Jacqueline Allen / Kim Slaaf6-4, 3-6, 0-1
2025-09-25vs SD 3.5WD Peninsula TC/ WilkinsonLost 01
L#3 DoublesGuadalupe Acosta / Denisse Fax vs Bonnie Reilly / Sonia Peterson4-6, 2-6
2025-09-11vs SD 3.5WD SDTRC/ AdamsLost 01
L#2 DoublesGuadalupe Acosta / Ana Gelastopoulos vs Lisa Shirley / Heather Ravenscroft1-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SD - Women - 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.05 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.41
Denisse Fax
published 3.5
3.39
Maria Salas Kazmi
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.32
Noelia Figueroa
published
3.24
Alicia S Molina
published 3.5
3.06
Natalia Lombrozo
published
2.96
Maria Patino
published
2.90
Guadalupe Acosta
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.86
Natalie Vaca
published
2.81
2.53
MARTHA OVIEDO
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Maria Salas Kazmi + Noelia Figueroa7257% games+4.5% vs expected
Maria Salas Kazmi + Denisse Fax3258% gamesnot enough data
Denisse Fax + Guadalupe Acosta314 matchesnot enough data
Denisse Fax + Natalia Lombrozo123 matchesnot enough data
Guadalupe Acosta + Noelia Figueroa303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Denisse Fax
9W–6L career · no lines in 2025
<1%73%26%
3.41
3.5
Maria Salas Kazmi
58W–18L career · 11 lines in 2025
<1%77%22%
3.39
Noelia Figueroa
13W–4L career · no lines in 2025
1%89%9%
3.32
3.5
Alicia S Molina
3W–2L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%3%
3.24
Natalia Lombrozo
13W–8L career · no lines in 2025
<1%33%67%
3.06
Maria Patino
1W–5L career · no lines in 2025
62%38%<1%
2.96
3
Guadalupe Acosta
54W–44L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%77%23%
2.90
Natalie Vaca
29W–15L career · no lines in 2025
1%84%16%
2.86
3
Ana Gelastopoulos
9W–9L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%9%
2.81
MARTHA OVIEDO
1W–4L career · no lines in 2025
41%59%<1%
2.53

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.