Teams

DORHS GREEN

2026 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - SOCO · WOMEN 5.0 - 40 & OVER - SOCO

3 players · average NTRP 4.50 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-07-15vs DORHS KISERLost 01
L#1 DoublesHeather Green / Joanne Peterson vs Lori Kiser / Laura Ewert7-5, 4-6, 0-1
2026-07-08vs DORHS KISERLost 01
L#1 SinglesBethany Pribila vs Lori Kiser4-6, 7-5, 0-1
2026-07-01vs DORHS KISERWon 10
W#1 DoublesHelene Afeman / Joanne Peterson vs Lori Kiser / Janet Chatterton6-2, 4-6, 1-0
2026-06-24vs DORHS KISERLost 02
L#1 DoublesHeather Green / Karen Jensen vs Lori Kiser / Sue Barone6-7, 4-6
L#1 SinglesBethany Pribila vs Janet Chatterton4-6, 2-6
2026-06-24vs DORHS KISERWon 10
W#1 SinglesBethany Pribila vs Lori Kiser6-1, 6-0
2026-06-10vs DORHS KISERLost 02
L#1 DoublesHeather Green / Joanne Peterson vs Janet Chatterton / Candace Vering2-6, 6-7
L#1 SinglesBethany Pribila vs Laura Ewert2-6, 0-6
2026-06-03vs DORHS KISERLost 02
L#1 DoublesHeather Green / Karen Jensen vs Lori Kiser / Candace Vering1-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesBethany Pribila vs Laura Ewert0-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · WOMEN 5.0 - 40 & OVER - SOCO
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1DORHS KISER3282570
2DORHS GREEN232816104

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.31 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.40
Joanne Peterson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.23
Bethany Pribila
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4.5
Karen Jensen
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Joanne Peterson
6W–5L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%77%23%
4.40
4.5
Bethany Pribila
9W–15L career · type S · 5 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
4.23
Karen Jensen
4W–17L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.