Teams

Pin Oak - Strung Out

*2023 Houston Fall League (2022) NA - Tuesday Ladies Doubles · 4.5 Ladies

17 players · average NTRP 4.00 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 4.5 Ladies have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.77 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.27
Michelle Griffith
published
4.05
Laurie Emerson
published
4.00
Jessica Emerald
published
3.94
Leslie Mandeville
published
3.94
Emily Huebner
published 4
3.85
Cara Dunn
published 4
Carol Franklin
published 4
Dana May
published 4
3.74
Dana Koger
published 4
3.60
Sheri Brown
published
3.56
Suzanne Brice
published
3.55
Judy de Alejandro
published
3.55
Laura Baxter
published
3.54
Brooke Griffith
published 4
3.46
Kristen Matthews
published
Gabrielle Long
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Carol Franklin + Cara Dunn17066% games+8.8% vs expected
Leslie Mandeville + Brooke Griffith2353% games−0.4% vs expected
Emily Huebner + Leslie Mandeville8165% games−2.4% vs expected
Laura Baxter + Leslie Mandeville3352% gamesnot enough data
Laura Baxter + Emily Huebner314 matchesnot enough data
Judy de Alejandro + Laura Baxter213 matchesnot enough data
Jessica Emerald + Laurie Emerson033 matchesnot enough data
Jessica Emerald + Michelle Griffith123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Michelle Griffith
28W–16L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%4%
4.27
Laurie Emerson
9W–21L career · no lines in 2023
35%65%<1%
4.05
Jessica Emerald
55W–37L career · no lines in 2023
51%49%<1%
4.00
Leslie Mandeville
66W–23L career · no lines in 2023
<1%67%33%
3.94
4
Emily Huebner
21W–4L career · no lines in 2023
<1%69%31%
3.94
Maria Garcia-Mireles
86W–31L career · no lines in 2023
<1%88%12%
3.85
4
Cara Dunn
31W–6L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
4
Carol Franklin
19W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
4
Dana May
4W–6L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
4
Dana Koger
10W–1L career · type S · no lines in 2023
3%94%2%
3.74
Sheri Brown
14W–12L career · no lines in 2023
23%77%<1%
3.60
Suzanne Brice
18W–14L career · no lines in 2023
32%68%<1%
3.56
Judy de Alejandro
30W–59L career · no lines in 2023
34%66%<1%
3.55
Laura Baxter
38W–35L career · no lines in 2023
36%64%<1%
3.55
4
Brooke Griffith
30W–32L career · no lines in 2023
37%63%<1%
3.54
Kristen Matthews
8W–12L career · no lines in 2023
62%38%<1%
3.46
Gabrielle Long
0W–9L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.