Teams

GSCC

2023 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - MOUNTAINS · WOMEN 2.5 - 18 & OVER - ASPEN

6 players · average NTRP 2.75 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-06-12vs BASALT BLACKSplit 11
W#1 DoublesKatherine Proctor / TONI COURTENAY vs Katie Fitzgerald / Jessie Hjorth6-3, 6-2
L#1 SinglesAshley Eberly vs Nancy Garrigus1-6, 1-6
2023-06-05vs BASALT BLACKWon 20
W#1 DoublesJon Nell Reeds / TONI COURTENAY vs Lauren Mirich / Jessie Hjorth6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesDoreen Young / Ashley Eberly vs Dena Albright / Molly Goscha6-1, 6-1
2023-05-31vs BASALT BLACKLost 12
L#1 DoublesLisa Palmer / Doreen Young vs Megan Vrono / Molly Goscha1-6
L#1 SinglesAshley Eberly vs Suzanne Wheeler-Del Piccolo1-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesJulie Kaufman / Katherine Proctor vs Bess Hammer / Dena Albright6-3, 7-6
2023-05-22vs BASALT BLACKWon 20
W#1 DoublesAshley Eberly / TONI COURTENAY vs Dena Albright / Jessie Hjorth4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesLisa Palmer / Katherine Proctor vs Suzanne Sherry / Renee Fleisher2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2023-05-15vs BASALT BLACKWon 20
W#1 DoublesKristin Davis / Jon Nell Reeds vs Dena Albright / Melissa Knight6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesLisa Palmer / Katherine Proctor vs Megan Vrono / Suzanne Sherry3-6, 6-1, 1-0
2023-05-08vs BASALT BLACKLost 01
L#1 DoublesJon Nell Reeds / Katherine Proctor vs Bess Hammer / Nancy Garrigus7-5, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 2.5 - 18 & OVER - ASPEN have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.19 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Doreen Young
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
Ashley Eberly
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
2.19
Katherine Proctor
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
2.18
TONI COURTENAY
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Jon Nell Reeds
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Margo Stapleton
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jon Nell Reeds + TONI COURTENAY4256% games+3.4% vs expected
Margo Stapleton + Jon Nell Reeds303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Doreen Young
7W–13L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
2.5
Ashley Eberly
9W–7L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
Katherine Proctor
10W–20L career · 5 lines in 2023
0%99%1%
2.19
TONI COURTENAY
22W–42L career · 3 lines in 2023
0%99%1%
2.18
Jon Nell Reeds
28W–12L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
Margo Stapleton
12W–18L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.