Teams

Greene/McCoy - Wichita

2024 KS 18 & Over Adult Indoor League · 2.5 Women

14 players · average NTRP 3.00 / KANSAS

View scouting list →
Schedule12 played
2024-03-23vs Bulnes - SalinaLost 12
L#1 DoublesRosanne Greene / Miriam Saad vs Cathy Hayes / Lesa Dunn2-6, 6-0, 0-1
W#1 SinglesPaula Bette vs Mayela Campa6-0, 6-0
L#2 DoublesNikki McCoy / Melissa Mangan vs Sadie Roesner / Maria Cheney4-6, 2-6
2024-03-23vs Bulnes - SalinaSplit 11
W#1 DoublesMiriam Saad / Paula Bette vs Lesa Dunn / Maria Cheney6-0, 6-0
L#2 DoublesMargo Parks / Katie Gann vs Cathy Hayes / Mayela Campa6-7, 6-0, 0-1
L#1 DoublesRosanne Greene / Katie Gann vs Amanda Ross / Abby Strathman1-6, 2-6
L#1 DoublesRosanne Greene / Nikki McCoy vs Kareem Thomas / Jayme Carpenter0-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesKatie Gann / Sylvia Orozco-Do vs Christina Wiens / Britt Trier0-6, 1-6
W#1 DoublesRosanne Greene / Melissa Mangan vs Alexandra Ahumada Palma / LewJene Schneider6-2, 6-3
W#1 SinglesPaula Bette vs Sadie Millard6-2, 6-1
W#1 DoublesRosanne Greene / Andrea Baalmann vs Sarah Myers / Theresa Devlin6-1, 6-4
L#1 SinglesAmanda Moreira vs NOURA ABBAS6-2, 1-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMelissa Mangan / Kelsey Burton vs Erica Combs / Lauren Glisson1-6, 3-6
2024-02-11vs Bulnes - SalinaLost 12
L#1 DoublesRosanne Greene / Paula Bette vs Sadie Roesner / Cathy Hayes1-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesMiriam Saad vs Renae Frost6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesMargo Parks / Andrea Baalmann vs Lindsey Sandquist / Maria Cheney1-6, 4-6
2024-02-11vs Bulnes - SalinaLost 12
L#1 DoublesNikki McCoy / Erin Goward vs Renae Frost / Cathy Hayes0-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesAmanda Moreira vs Lindsey Sandquist6-3, 6-1
L#2 DoublesNancy Graber / Melissa Mangan vs Sadie Roesner / Mayela Campa3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#1 DoublesRosanne Greene / Katie Gann vs Sadie Millard / Sarah Myers0-6, 6-7
W#1 SinglesPaula Bette vs Rhiannon Taylor6-1, 6-4
W#2 DoublesKelsey Burton / Christie Singh vs Erica Combs / LeAnn Taylor7-6, 0-2, 1-0
W#1 DoublesRosanne Greene / Paula Bette vs Deanna Putnam / Suzanne Elkharbotly6-0, 6-1
W#1 SinglesMiriam Saad vs NOURA ABBAS6-2, 5-2
L#2 DoublesKatie Gann / Margo Parks vs Charissa Evans / Ann Staples3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#1 DoublesPaula Bette / Katie Gann vs Hope Bright / ShaNoah Emory6-7, 3-1, 1-0
W#1 SinglesMiriam Saad vs Danielle Kruse6-0, 6-2
L#2 DoublesKelsey Burton / Melissa Mangan vs Michelle Schulte / Christina Wiens1-6, 0-6
W#1 DoublesAndrea Baalmann / Rosanne Greene vs Hope Bright / Danielle Kruse6-3, 7-6
W#1 SinglesPaula Bette vs Christina Wiens6-0, 6-2
L#2 DoublesChristie Singh / Margo Parks vs ShaNoah Emory / Michelle Schulte0-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 2.5 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1KS/Kruse-Thoele/Caudill/18&Over2.5W83231020171
2Greene/McCoy - Wichita65161736253
3Genesis, Rock Road - Winter 2024 Team 1210142251342

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.54 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.11
Amanda Moreira
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
2.90
Paula Bette
usually #1 Singles 42%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.70
Andrea Baalmann
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.55
Miriam Saad
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #1 Singles 43% · published
Christie Singh
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.11
Rosanne Greene
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
1.89
Katie Gann
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Erin Goward
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Kelsey Burton
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Margo Parks
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Melissa Mangan
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
Nancy Graber
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Nikki McCoy
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Sylvia Orozco-Do
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Amanda Moreira + Paula Bette10265% games+10.2% vs expected
Rosanne Greene + Paula Bette123 matchesnot enough data
Rosanne Greene + Katie Gann033 matchesnot enough data
Miriam Saad + Paula Bette213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Amanda Moreira
45W–27L career · 5 lines in 2024
22%78%<1%
3.11
Paula Bette
83W–65L career · 12 lines in 2024
<1%75%25%
2.90
3
Andrea Baalmann
21W–25L career · 3 lines in 2024
8%91%2%
2.70
Miriam Saad
14W–20L career · 7 lines in 2024
36%64%<1%
2.55
2.5
Christie Singh
1W–5L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Rosanne Greene
21W–45L career · 12 lines in 2024
0%>99%<1%
2.11
Katie Gann
2W–11L career · 6 lines in 2024
0%>99%<1%
1.89
Erin Goward
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
Kelsey Burton
3W–5L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Margo Parks
0W–4L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
Melissa Mangan
1W–4L career · 5 lines in 2024
not enough data
Nancy Graber
0W–3L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
Nikki McCoy
7W–17L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Sylvia Orozco-Do
0W–2L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.