Teams

SSC Weitzel 8.5

2024 Sarasota Combo 18 & Over Fall Weekend · 8.5 M Saturday

16 players · average NTRP 3.88 / REGION_5

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-11-11vs Sarasota/Crutchfield/18&Over8.5MWon 10
W#1 DoublesJonathan Hancock / Peter Laughlin vs Chris Canfield / Calvin Hac6-3, 6-2
2024-11-02vs GT Bray AbrahamWon 10
W#3 DoublesGustavo Risquez / Phillip Mihm vs Larry Denyes / Steven Shulla7-6, 7-6
2024-10-19vs Sarasota/Crutchfield/18&Over8.5MLost 01
L#2 DoublesThiago Domingues / Peter Laughlin vs Calvin Hac / Eric Abbott7-6, 5-7, 0-1
2024-10-18vs Sarasota/Crutchfield/18&Over8.5MWon 10
W#3 DoublesThiago Domingues / Peter Laughlin vs Michael Boothman / William Rhodes6-3, 1-6, 1-0
2024-10-05vs GT Bray AbrahamWon 10
W#2 DoublesJonathan Hancock / Gustavo Risquez vs Reny Abraham / Steven Shulla6-3, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.5 M Saturday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.73 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.05
Alan Amero
published 4.5
3.91
Nate Macksey
published
3.83
Barney Akierman
published 4
3.81
Jim Fiumefreddo
published
3.81
Felipe Soto
published
3.81
Gustavo Risquez
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.73
Kip Schoonover
published
3.73
Peter Laughlin
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.67
Joseph Casanova
published
2.95
Cyndi Weitzel
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
Marc Jarman
published
Moncef Bennaji
published
Phillip Mihm
published
Scott Schuhriemen
published
Steven Paley
published
Thiago Domingues
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Peter Laughlin + Gustavo Risquez2450% gamesnot enough data
Peter Laughlin + Felipe Soto213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Alan Amero
2W–5L career · no lines in 2024
37%63%<1%
4.05
Nate Macksey
69W–38L career · no lines in 2024
<1%74%26%
3.91
4
Barney Akierman
20W–8L career · no lines in 2024
1%88%11%
3.83
Jim Fiumefreddo
9W–0L career · no lines in 2024
1%90%9%
3.81
Felipe Soto
20W–11L career · no lines in 2024
1%90%9%
3.81
4
Gustavo Risquez
206W–174L career · 5 lines in 2024
1%90%8%
3.81
Kip Schoonover
13W–8L career · no lines in 2024
5%92%3%
3.73
Peter Laughlin
76W–45L career · 3 lines in 2024
5%92%2%
3.73
Joseph Casanova
1W–8L career · no lines in 2024
12%87%1%
3.67
3
Cyndi Weitzel
73W–73L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%64%36%
2.95
Marc Jarman
4W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Moncef Bennaji
13W–16L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Phillip Mihm
12W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Scott Schuhriemen
2W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Steven Paley
2W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Thiago Domingues
10W–4L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.