Teams

Elysium 2

2024 WINTER A18&O WEEKEND · 2024 Winter A18&O 3.5 WOMEN Career

20 players · average NTRP 3.30 / OHIO VALLEY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 2024 Winter A18&O 3.5 WOMEN Career have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.29 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.53
MaryChris Williams
published
3.49
Heather Schumm
published
3.46
Christie Heinlen
published 3.5
3.40
Kim Keys
published
3.38
Jessie Kremeier
published
3.34
Mary Sampsel
published
3.32
Melissa Paull
published
3.26
Liberty Gregory
published
Catherina Bishopp
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.23
Christine Berman
published 3.5
3.23
Janine Keeler
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.07
Sandy McLoughlin
published
2.82
Cynthia Humphry
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
Anne Clark
published 3
Jackie Berendt
published
Jan Chorich
published
Jennifer Monte
published
Linda McBride
published
Mary Jobe
published
Nancy Rothacker
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Melissa Paull + Jessie Kremeier5079% games+22.1% vs expected
Mary Sampsel + Christie Heinlen7062% games+8.8% vs expected
Mary Jobe + Christie Heinlen5164% games+8.0% vs expected
Mary Sampsel + Jan Chorich6165% games+7.3% vs expected
MaryChris Williams + Jessie Kremeier14167% games+7.0% vs expected
Kim Keys + Liberty Gregory6162% games+6.6% vs expected
Mary Sampsel + Kim Keys4160% games+4.8% vs expected
Christine Berman + Jan Chorich6262% games+3.7% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

MaryChris Williams
145W–77L career · no lines in 2024
<1%42%58%
3.53
Heather Schumm
76W–24L career · no lines in 2024
<1%52%48%
3.49
3.5
Christie Heinlen
175W–57L career · no lines in 2024
<1%63%37%
3.46
Kim Keys
120W–65L career · no lines in 2024
<1%76%24%
3.40
Jessie Kremeier
120W–50L career · no lines in 2024
<1%80%20%
3.38
Mary Sampsel
184W–87L career · no lines in 2024
1%87%12%
3.34
Melissa Paull
135W–57L career · no lines in 2024
<1%1%99%
3.32
Liberty Gregory
159W–79L career · no lines in 2024
3%93%4%
3.26
3.5
Catherina Bishopp
28W–54L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
3.5
Christine Berman
100W–63L career · no lines in 2024
5%92%3%
3.23
Janine Keeler
171W–95L career · 4 lines in 2024
5%92%3%
3.23
Sandy McLoughlin
23W–39L career · no lines in 2024
31%69%<1%
3.07
3
Cynthia Humphry
134W–53L career · 4 lines in 2024
1%89%9%
2.82
3
Anne Clark
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Jackie Berendt
24W–24L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Jan Chorich
19W–7L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Jennifer Monte
50W–30L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Linda McBride
19W–54L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Mary Jobe
21W–11L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Nancy Rothacker
75W–48L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.