Teams

Magnon/40/6.5/CM/SOAC

2026 BR Southern Combo 40 & Over - Men · 6.5 BR (40&O) Men

12 players · average NTRP 3.00 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 upcoming · 4 played
Sep 8 6:30 PM
Southern Oaks Athletic Club
Sep 15 6:30 PM
Independence Park Tennis Center
Sep 22 6:30 PM
Southern Oaks Athletic Club
Sep 29 6:30 PM
vs N/A
Stephen Magnon
Oct 6 6:30 PM
Southern Oaks Athletic Club
2026-08-25vs Braud/40/6.5/CM/SOACLost 03
L#1 DoublesJaime Nevarez / Benny Lenox vs Frederick Stevenson / Kenny Burns4-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesKeith Schultz / Jeff Schneider vs Burk Heroman / Stewart Guerin2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesStephen Magnon / Irfan Hasan vs Barry Eggie / David Lindsey6-2, 4-6, 0-1
2026-08-17vs Mannino/40/6.5/CM/UCLost 03
L#1 DoublesRichard Howell / Keith Nelson vs Kenneth Aldridge / Cleve Brown5-7, 6-7
L#2 DoublesMark Mains / Joey Crifasi vs Matthew Mannino / Matt Hunt6-7, 3-6
L#3 DoublesJaime Nevarez / Richard Miller vs Michael Dupont / Justin Miller1-6, 2-6
2026-08-04vs Ligh/40/6.5/CM/BRECLost 03
L#1 DoublesRichard Ward / Mark Mains vs Thomas Wafer / Chandra Kandula2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesTom Baggett / Richard Miller vs Tom Crowell / J C Richardson2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesKeith Schultz / Richard Howell vs Jody Capello / John So0-6, 3-6
2026-07-28vs Mulkey/40/6.5/CM/CCLALost 12
L#1 DoublesJaime Nevarez / Benny Lenox vs Brian Leonard / Chris Allen2-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesJoey Crifasi / Richard Howell vs Robert Hebert / Jeremy Martin6-4, 1-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesStephen Magnon / Erik Burns vs James Peltier / Kip Smith2-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings5 teams · 6.5 BR (40&O) Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Ligh/40/6.5/CM/BREC3072773
2Mulkey/40/6.5/CM/CCLA2042648
3Mannino/40/6.5/CM/UC2163675
4Braud/40/6.5/CM/SOAC03361394
5Magnon/40/6.5/CM/SOAC031817109

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.97 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.16
Joey Crifasi
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.14
Richard Ward
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.12
Jaime Nevarez
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.11
Stephen Magnon
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.08
Keith Schultz
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.05
Tom Baggett
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.70
Benny Lenox
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.69
Jeff Schneider
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.67
Mark Mains
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Erik Burns
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Irfan Hasan
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Richard Howell
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Richard Ward + Jaime Nevarez0828% games−14.5% vs expected
Benny Lenox + Jaime Nevarez134 matchesnot enough data
Stephen Magnon + Richard Ward033 matchesnot enough data
Richard Ward + Mark Mains123 matchesnot enough data
Richard Ward + Joey Crifasi213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Joey Crifasi
34W–23L career · 2 lines in 2026
13%86%1%
3.16
Richard Ward
11W–26L career · 1 line in 2026
16%84%1%
3.14
Jaime Nevarez
15W–41L career · 3 lines in 2026
19%81%<1%
3.12
Stephen Magnon
9W–27L career · 2 lines in 2026
22%77%<1%
3.11
Keith Schultz
6W–19L career · 2 lines in 2026
29%71%<1%
3.08
Tom Baggett
7W–27L career · 1 line in 2026
37%63%<1%
3.05
3
Benny Lenox
4W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
7%91%2%
2.70
Jeff Schneider
1W–18L career · 1 line in 2026
99%1%<1%
2.69
Mark Mains
4W–9L career · 2 lines in 2026
11%88%1%
2.67
Erik Burns
0W–6L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Irfan Hasan
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Richard Howell
2W–7L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.