Teams

C 7.5M MM Kun

2022 NEOTA Combo Fall · NEOTA 7.5 Combo M Fall

13 players · average NTRP 3.75 / NORTHEASTERN OHIO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-11-11vs C 7.5M MV FalconeLost 12
L#1 DoublesRicardo Caldera / Michael Jenkins vs Eric Mock / Ken Gustafson2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesAndrew Albrecht / Sebastian Baumgaertel vs Mark Atkinson / Phong Nguyen4-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#3 DoublesPhilip Mellizo / Kyle Zubricky vs Michael Falcone / Akin Fashina6-2, 6-1
2022-11-06vs C 7.5M WE CleggWon 30
W#1 DoublesJason Kun / Andrew Albrecht vs Peter Frankfort / Constantine Elefter3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKyle Zubricky / David Petrefski vs Karl Burtnett / Daniel Davila6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesPhilip Mellizo / Sebastian Baumgaertel vs Seth Unger / David Ries7-6, 6-0
2022-10-30vs C 7.5M WR SharmaWon 10
W#1 DoublesMatthew Perciavalle / Kyle Zubricky vs JAYATU DAS SARMA / Sameer Shah6-0, 6-0
2022-10-21vs C 7.5M PW MikolichSplit 11
W#1 DoublesDavid Petrefski / Kyle Zubricky vs Nick Karas / Adam Lee6-4, 6-4
L#2 DoublesAaron Carlson / Philip Mellizo vs David Fleischer / David Rickard7-6, 5-7, 0-1
2022-10-08vs C 7.5M MV FalconeLost 12
W#1 DoublesJason Kun / Andrew Albrecht vs Preet Kang / Garnett Meador6-4, 6-3
L#2 DoublesRicardo Caldera / Kyle Zubricky vs Akin Fashina / Ken Gustafson4-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#3 DoublesMatthew Perciavalle / Sebastian Baumgaertel vs Michael Falcone / Eric Mock3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2022-09-30vs C 7.5M WE CleggSplit 11
W#1 DoublesDavid Petrefski / Kyle Zubricky vs VLAD VOLKOV / Daniel Davila6-1, 6-4
L#2 DoublesDerek Kohanski / Michael Jenkins vs James Pruce / Peter Frankfort2-6, 4-6
2022-09-23vs C 7.5M WR SharmaWon 30
W#1 DoublesRicardo Caldera / David Petrefski vs Avinash Prasad / Amit Jain6-1, 6-4
W#2 DoublesAndrew Albrecht / Aaron Carlson vs Himanshu Patel / Rahul Jain6-1, 6-0
W#3 DoublesSebastian Baumgaertel / Philip Mellizo vs JAYATU DAS SARMA / Bhavesh Desai6-2, 6-1
2022-09-16vs C 7.5M PW MikolichSplit 11
W#1 DoublesDavid Petrefski / Ricardo Caldera vs David Rickard / Freddy Carrillo6-2, 1-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMichael Jenkins / Kuldeep Vaghela vs Kent Dinchman / Chance Nicklaus2-6, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings10 teams · NEOTA 7.5 Combo M Fall
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1NEO OH C 7.5M Hosner7120411141
2C 7.5M PW Mikolich6217717160
3C 7.5M NC1 Monahan6217718196
4C 7.5M WE Clegg62141024207
5C 7.5M PM Hurley53141023208
6C 7.5M MV Falcone5315924195
7C 7.5M MM Kun35141022181
8C 7.5M NC2 Williams2661839260
9C 7.5M TP Fox0832142263
10C 7.5M WR Sharma0802448288

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.66 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.92
Kyle Zubricky
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.83
Andrew Albrecht
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published 4
David Petrefski
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.72
Matthew Perciavalle
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.64
Matthew Horwich
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.60
Michael Jenkins
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published
Aaron Carlson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.24
Derek Kohanski
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
Jason Kun
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Kuldeep Vaghela
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Philip Mellizo
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
Ricardo Caldera
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Sebastian Baumgaertel
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

David Petrefski + Kyle Zubricky6164% games+10.8% vs expected
Jason Kun + Aaron Carlson10263% games+7.7% vs expected
David Petrefski + Ricardo Caldera314 matchesnot enough data
Jason Kun + Ricardo Caldera224 matchesnot enough data
Matthew Horwich + Ricardo Caldera213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kyle Zubricky
67W–25L career · 6 lines in 2022
<1%72%28%
3.92
4
Andrew Albrecht
85W–57L career · 7 lines in 2022
1%90%10%
3.83
4
David Petrefski
51W–42L career · 8 lines in 2022
not enough data
Matthew Perciavalle
59W–41L career · 2 lines in 2022
5%94%1%
3.72
Matthew Horwich
118W–150L career · 4 lines in 2022
14%86%<1%
3.64
Michael Jenkins
59W–53L career · 7 lines in 2022
23%77%<1%
3.60
3.5
Aaron Carlson
72W–34L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Derek Kohanski
65W–87L career · 4 lines in 2022
3%94%2%
3.24
Jason Kun
55W–22L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Kuldeep Vaghela
40W–18L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Philip Mellizo
35W–21L career · 7 lines in 2022
not enough data
Ricardo Caldera
88W–48L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
Sebastian Baumgaertel
40W–21L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.