Teams

Je.Fogleman55C

2026 Capital Combo 55 & Over · 6.5 Women

13 players · average NTRP 3.27 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2026-08-27vs Pa.Cochran55CLost 12
L#1 DoublesAlison Bernhardt / Tina Jones vs Millie Rushton / Judy Colby2-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesVicki Fritsch / Katherine Rostick vs Linda Eskridge / Christine Mccorquodale6-2, 1-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesAnn Pershke / Lori Bourne vs Eleanor Jones / Carol Rosser6-3, 6-1
2026-08-20vs Ju.Shuey55CLost 12
L#1 DoublesMary Cockrill / Joanne Butler vs Juli Johnson / Julee Knight3-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesDeanna Drescher / Jennifer Fogleman vs Ann Willard / Vickie Fuller6-2, 4-3
L#3 DoublesLori Bourne / Ann Ashburn vs Sharon Lambe / Kelly Huffstetler5-7, 4-6
2026-08-13vs Ca.Conzola55C6.5Lost 12
W#1 DoublesVicki Fritsch / Jennifer Fogleman vs Christine Reinke / Suzanne Ruggles6-4, 5-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMary Cockrill / Jean Williams vs Laura Munster / Myra Peterson2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesKaren Gupton / Tina Jones vs Camille Conzola / Jan Copeland2-6, 3-6
2026-08-12vs Te.Jones55CWon 21
W#1 DoublesDeanna Drescher / Jennifer Fogleman vs Terry Jones / Kris Wordsworth7-5, 7-6
W#2 DoublesKaren Gupton / Jean Williams vs Beth Burrus / Nan McNamara6-2, 6-2
L#3 DoublesAnn Ashburn / Rachel Pisciotta vs Sarah McAdams / Alisa Smith3-6, 7-5, 1-0
2026-08-06vs We.Sielaty55CWon 30
W#1 DoublesLori Bourne / Jean Williams vs Jennifer Wolborsky / Marie Gelston6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesAlison Bernhardt / Jennifer Fogleman vs Sharon Fadelici / Jill Salstrand6-2, 6-4
W#3 DoublesMary Cockrill / Cynthia White vs Evelyn Andino / Jade Paunovich6-3, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings18 teams · 6.5 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Ca.Conzola55C6.540102780
2Ki.Manning55C3072877
3Ki.Lamb55C6.53063982
4Ta.LeFevre55C6.53193887
5Gi.Flynn55C3193989
6Ju.Shuey55C317512108
7Ca.Werder55C317512103
8Be.Robertson55C2154979
9Je.Fogleman55C227511112
10Pe.LeGaux55C225716115
11We.Sielaty55C224817128
12Ap.Lyon55C12451178
13Te.Jones55C136613103
14Sh.Elder55C133918129
15St.Grose55C03361390
16Je.Komes55C6.503271491
17Pa.Cochran55C0421020136
18Ka.Serow55C6.5043921133

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.95 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.29
Deanna Drescher
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.25
Lori Bourne
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.18
Rachel Pisciotta
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.12
Mary Cockrill
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.06
Jean Williams
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.04
Vicki Fritsch
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.04
Alison Bernhardt
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.01
Karen Gupton
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.82
Jennifer Fogleman
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.77
Katherine Rostick
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.68
Ann Pershke
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.60
Joanne Butler
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.50
Ann Ashburn
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mary Cockrill + Jennifer Fogleman3748% games+12.8% vs expected
Jennifer Fogleman + Alison Bernhardt122744% games−7.2% vs expected
Karen Gupton + Alison Bernhardt1634% games−19.1% vs expected
Deanna Drescher + Jennifer Fogleman10952% gamesnot enough data
Mary Cockrill + Karen Gupton0623% gamesnot enough data
Ann Ashburn + Karen Gupton3350% gamesnot enough data
Lori Bourne + Deanna Drescher2355% gamesnot enough data
Lori Bourne + Jennifer Fogleman2346% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Deanna Drescher
112W–101L career · 3 lines in 2026
2%91%7%
3.29
3.5
Lori Bourne
77W–80L career · 3 lines in 2026
4%93%4%
3.25
3.5
Rachel Pisciotta
108W–84L career · 1 line in 2026
10%89%1%
3.18
3.5
Mary Cockrill
61W–96L career · 3 lines in 2026
20%80%<1%
3.12
Jean Williams
5W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
34%66%<1%
3.06
Vicki Fritsch
1W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
38%61%<1%
3.04
3.5
Alison Bernhardt
57W–97L career · 2 lines in 2026
40%60%<1%
3.04
3.5
Karen Gupton
63W–124L career · 2 lines in 2026
48%52%<1%
3.01
3
Jennifer Fogleman
65W–126L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%89%10%
2.82
3
Katherine Rostick
55W–62L career · 1 line in 2026
2%92%5%
2.77
3
Ann Pershke
2W–3L career · 1 line in 2026
9%89%1%
2.68
3
Joanne Butler
44W–71L career · 1 line in 2026
23%77%<1%
2.60
3
Ann Ashburn
19W–59L career · 2 lines in 2026
49%51%<1%
2.50

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.