Teams

Wallace - RS Clay

2023 Escambia Adult 18 & Over · 4.0 Adult 18 & Over - Men

8 players · average NTRP 4.00 / REGION_1

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-06-01vs B. Worley - RS ClaySplit 11
W#1 DoublesRudy Seelmann / Jason Struck vs Michael Yager / Hiep Du6-3, 6-4
L#3 DoublesLockland Tyler / Kirk Bradley vs Russ Parris / Kevin Groom6-7, 7-6, 0-1
2023-05-25vs Duncan - SHLWon 20
W#1 DoublesJason Struck / Rudy Seelmann vs Kyle Ehlers / Colton Wilson3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#2 DoublesELBERT WOMBLE / Lockland Tyler vs Jared Veltman / Tyler Gross6-3, 6-4
2023-05-18vs B. Worley - RS ClayWon 20
W#2 DoublesKirk Bradley / Lockland Tyler vs Christopher Brown / Martin Foret6-1, 7-6
W#3 DoublesSamuel Wallace / Will Spencer vs Kevin Groom / Jonathan Garcia3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2023-05-04vs Duncan - SHLSplit 11
L#1 DoublesRudy Seelmann / Jason Struck vs Kyle Ehlers / Trip Carter - (DQ)*4-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#3 DoublesWill Spencer / Stephen McCrory vs Tyson Dunkelberger / Jared Veltman6-1, 6-2
2023-04-27vs B. Worley - RS ClaySplit 11
W#1 DoublesRudy Seelmann / Jason Struck vs Hiep Du / Calvin Moore6-2, 6-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesKirk Bradley / Lockland Tyler vs Brett Worley / Christopher Brown3-6, 3-6
2023-04-13vs Duncan - SHLSplit 11
W#2 DoublesKirk Bradley / Lockland Tyler vs Tyson Dunkelberger / Michael Miller6-3, 6-3
L#3 DoublesELBERT WOMBLE / Will Spencer vs Colton Wilson / Kyle Wilson2-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Adult 18 & Over - Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.75 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.96
Will Spencer
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 30% · published
3.93
Bennett Gaston
published 4
3.83
Jason Struck
published
3.80
Samuel Wallace
published
3.79
Rudy Seelmann
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.66
Lockland Tyler
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
3.58
Kirk Bradley
published
3.47
ELBERT WOMBLE
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lockland Tyler + Kirk Bradley123 matchesnot enough data
Rudy Seelmann + Jason Struck123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Will Spencer
121W–56L career · 10 lines in 2023
<1%61%39%
3.96
4
Bennett Gaston
13W–5L career · no lines in 2023
<1%69%31%
3.93
Jason Struck
9W–14L career · no lines in 2023
1%88%11%
3.83
Samuel Wallace
7W–5L career · no lines in 2023
2%91%7%
3.80
Rudy Seelmann
95W–47L career · 4 lines in 2023
2%92%6%
3.79
Lockland Tyler
47W–37L career · 5 lines in 2023
13%86%1%
3.66
Kirk Bradley
3W–18L career · no lines in 2023
30%70%<1%
3.58
ELBERT WOMBLE
2W–13L career · no lines in 2023
59%41%<1%
3.47

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.