Teams

JMCC/Lynch

2026 COTA USTA Adult 18 & Over Business Women - Spring · Business Women 2.5

6 players · average NTRP 2.50 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2026-03-26vs TGC/KennedyLost 02
L#1 SinglesClaire Fortenberry vs Marianna Williams4-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesClaire Lynch / Jane Anne Ridings vs Jessica Gibson / Abby Dickerson4-6, 0-6
2026-03-01vs BP/Chambliss Spring 26Won 30
W#1 DoublesAngie Garcia / Rhonda Williams vs Tori Brooks / Vivian Liddell6-2, 6-1
W#1 SinglesLisa Kirksey vs Whitney Ostrander6-3, 6-0
W#2 DoublesClaire Fortenberry / Joanne Steele vs Amy Murphy / Andrea Diamond6-1, 6-2
2026-02-08vs COTA/Nichole UnderwoodLost 12
L#1 DoublesLisa Kirksey / Susan Nixon vs Nichole Underwood / Jessica Myers1-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesRhonda Williams vs Brandy Chandler1-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesJane Anne Ridings / Claire Lynch vs Jessica Kanazawa / Kinna Vichathep7-6, 0-6, 1-0
2026-02-06vs BP/Chambliss Spring 26Won 30
W#1 DoublesClaire Lynch / Angie Garcia vs Amy Murphy / Esra Santesso7-6, 7-6
W#1 SinglesClaire Fortenberry vs Paola de Santo6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesSusan Nixon / Rhonda Williams vs Rachel Cabaniss / Alexandra Brown6-2, 6-0
2026-02-01vs TGC/KennedyWon 21
W#1 DoublesClaire Lynch / Susan Nixon vs Amberly Kenny / Audrey Williams6-0, 6-0
L#1 SinglesClaire Fortenberry vs Ali Knox3-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesAngie Garcia / Rhonda Williams vs Victoria Stephens / Rachel Webb6-2, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings5 teams · Business Women 2.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1COTA/Nichole Underwood6115613144
2JMCC/Lynch4312921173
3ACC/STEELE34101124181
4BP/Crenshaw/Yancey2581328242
5BP/Chambliss Spring 261651634238

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.26 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.52
Claire Fortenberry
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
2.42
Joanne Steele
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.28
Claire Lynch
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
2.17
Lisa Kirksey
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.14
Rhonda Williams
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.04
Jane Anne Ridings
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

2.5
Claire Fortenberry
7W–5L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%45%55%
2.52
Joanne Steele
10W–10L career · 1 line in 2026
0%73%27%
2.42
2.5
Claire Lynch
7W–5L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%95%5%
2.28
Lisa Kirksey
8W–15L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%99%1%
2.17
Rhonda Williams
8W–9L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.14
Jane Anne Ridings
1W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.04

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.