← Teams

SFV Crazy Aces

SFV-Mixed 40 & Over · SFV 40 & Over MXD Doubles 7.0

15 players · average NTRP 3.69 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2021-06-25Won 1–0
W#3 DoublesAnand Radhakrishnan / TANIA JANICEK vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2021-06-13vs LLW - SFV Magnificent 7- Larissa KazantsevLost 0–1
L#2 DoublesTANIA JANICEK / Jeff Davis vs Teri Gustafson / Mel Tolentino1-6, 3-6
2021-05-29Won 1–0
W#3 DoublesTANIA JANICEK / Anand Radhakrishnan vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2021-05-23vs LLW - SFV Magnificent 7- Larissa KazantsevWon 2–0
W#2 DoublesAnand Radhakrishnan / TANIA JANICEK vs Larissa Kazantsev / John Hernandez6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesCarol Stevenson / Mel Matibag vs Linda Dinneny / Mauricio Muller - *6-1, 7-5
2021-05-22vs SFV Mixed UpWon 1–0
W#2 DoublesMonica Kaplan / Michael Dubkin vs Gonzalo Mendez / Molly Jackson6-4, 7-6
2021-05-16vs SFV Alley GatorsLost 0–1
L#1 DoublesMel Matibag / Carol Stevenson vs Mitchell Wong / Heidi Wettenhall4-6, 1-6
2021-05-02Lost 0–1
L#2 DoublesTANIA JANICEK / Mel Matibag vs Holly Culhane / Dan Lula4-6, 7-5, 0-1
2021-05-01vs SFV Dream WeaversWon 1–0
W#1 DoublesAlain Banas / TANIA JANICEK vs Victor Contin / Sara Gabriel1-6, 7-6, 1-0
2021-04-18Won 1–0
W#2 DoublesAnand Radhakrishnan / Jenny Ulch vs Dan Meyers / Michelle Tepper6-2, 7-5
2021-04-10vs SFV PV CrushersWon 1–0
W#3 DoublesMichael Dubkin / Monica Kaplan vs Teri Lorenzo / Ken Green3-6, 7-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SFV 40 & Over MXD Doubles 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.39 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.92
Patricia Dunn
published —
3.85
3.83
Alain Banas
published 4
3.44
Paul Brosche
published —
3.43
Annie Schwartz
published 4
3.42
Jenny Ulch
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.38
Peggy Perazzo
published 3.5
3.26
TANIA JANICEK
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.16
Mel Matibag
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.14
Jorge Perazzo
published —
3.13
Monica Kaplan
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.06
Janine Baker
published —
3.00
ZELMA HIGGS
published —
—
Julianne Wood
published —
—
Monique Reyes
published —
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

TANIA JANICEK + Mel Matibag1–34 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

—
Patricia Dunn
23W–18L career · no lines in 2021
<1%74%26%
3.92
4
Amanda Richardson
30W–12L career · no lines in 2021
<1%88%12%
3.85
4
Alain Banas
3W–2L career · no lines in 2021
1%90%9%
3.83
—
Paul Brosche
4W–11L career · no lines in 2021
68%32%<1%
3.44
4
Annie Schwartz
144W–179L career · no lines in 2021
72%28%<1%
3.43
3.5
Jenny Ulch
70W–36L career · 1 line in 2021
<1%72%28%
3.42
3.5
Peggy Perazzo
125W–139L career · no lines in 2021
<1%82%18%
3.38
3.5
TANIA JANICEK
102W–89L career · 6 lines in 2021
2%94%3%
3.26
3.5
Mel Matibag
46W–57L career · 3 lines in 2021
10%89%<1%
3.16
—
Jorge Perazzo
2W–5L career · no lines in 2021
14%86%<1%
3.14
3.5
Monica Kaplan
43W–94L career · 2 lines in 2021
16%84%<1%
3.13
—
Janine Baker
10W–3L career · no lines in 2021
<1%31%69%
3.06
—
ZELMA HIGGS
9W–4L career · no lines in 2021
48%52%<1%
3.00
—
Julianne Wood
2W–5L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
—
—
Monique Reyes
2W–1L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
—

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.