Teams

Hitsquad 40+

2021 Neb. Mixed 40&Over · 8.0 Mixed

11 players · average NTRP 3.67 / NEBRASKA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2021-02-19vs TeglerWon 21
W#1 DoublesStephanie Eells / Thad Fineran vs Tammy Tegler / Doug Tegler6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesPaul Spors / Heidi Peirce vs Rick Stempson / Catherine Porath1-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesStephan Andersen / Julie Obear vs Kari Stempson / Scott Porath6-2, 6-1
2021-02-12vs TeglerWon 21
L#1 DoublesLisa Smith / Thad Fineran vs Rick Stempson / Amy Williams3-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesHeidi Peirce / Erik Johnson vs Scott Porath / Tammy Tegler6-2, 6-4
W#3 DoublesJulie Obear / Stephan Andersen vs Jacob Bliven / Shalla Powell Mandigo6-2, 6-1
2021-02-05vs TeglerWon 21
L#1 DoublesBarbara Scribner / David Stoupa vs Scott Porath / Tammy Tegler4-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesThad Fineran / Stephanie Eells vs Kevin Heim / Catherine Porath6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesHeidi Peirce / Paul Spors vs Kari Stempson / Ryan Rathe7-6, 1-6, 1-0
2021-01-29vs TeglerLost 12
L#1 DoublesStephanie Eells / Thad Fineran vs Rick Stempson / Amy Williams4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesNicole Carmine / Erik Johnson vs Tammy Tegler / Scott Porath5-7, 2-6
W#3 DoublesJulie Obear / Stephan Andersen vs Sarah Dirksen / Jacob Bliven6-3, 6-2
2021-01-22vs TeglerLost 12
W#1 DoublesThad Fineran / Lisa Smith vs Rick Stempson / Amy Williams6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesErik Johnson / Barbara Scribner vs Kevin Heim / Catherine Porath4-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesStephan Andersen / Nadia Gove vs Scott Porath / Tammy Tegler6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2021-01-15vs TeglerWon 30
W#1 DoublesJulie Obear / Ty Schmidt vs Ryan Rathe / Kari Stempson6-4, 6-0
W#2 DoublesPaul Spors / Nadia Gove vs Sarah Dirksen / Jacob Bliven6-3, 6-0
W#3 DoublesDavid Stoupa / Heidi Peirce vs Doug Tegler / Shalla Powell Mandigo6-2, 6-3
2021-01-08vs TeglerLost 12
W#1 DoublesStephanie Eells / Thad Fineran vs Kevin Heim / Catherine Porath7-6, 6-3
L#2 DoublesLisa Smith / Stephan Andersen vs Ryan Rathe / Kari Stempson2-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesNicole Carmine / Paul Spors vs Tammy Tegler / Doug Tegler6-0, 5-7, 0-1
2020-02-14vs WaltonWon 30
W#1 DoublesNicole Carmine / John Reimnitz vs Dana Caudle / Susan Hanson6-3, 7-5
W#2 DoublesHeidi Peirce / Erik Johnson vs Roger Penland / Linda Walton6-2, 6-4
W#3 DoublesJulie Obear / Steve Warner vs Tami Bourland / Craig Hendricks6-0, 6-2
2020-01-18vs WaltonWon 20
W#1 DoublesNicole Carmine / Rick Stempson vs Dana Caudle / Susan Hanson6-4, 6-1
W#2 DoublesRyan Johnson / Nadia Gove vs Joseph Lopez-Wilson / Debra Adams6-2, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · 8.0 Mixed
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1NE/Erwin/40&over8.0MXD7120414163
2Tong6217720204
3Hitsquad 40+4312920176
4Mixed Cocktails26101430218

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.64 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.14
Julie Obear
usually #3 Doubles 56%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
4.09
Stephanie Eells
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.72
Ty Schmidt
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.71
David Stoupa
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.63
Stephan Andersen
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
3.50
Nicole Carmine
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 10% · published
3.23
Heidi Peirce
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.12
Barbara Scribner
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Nadia Gove
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Paul Spors
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Thad Fineran
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Julie Obear + Ty Schmidt9364% games+12.5% vs expected
Nicole Carmine + Stephan Andersen10655% games+5.4% vs expected
Julie Obear + Stephan Andersen8264% games+5.0% vs expected
Nicole Carmine + David Stoupa3254% gamesnot enough data
Stephanie Eells + Thad Fineran314 matchesnot enough data
Nadia Gove + Paul Spors303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Julie Obear
100W–55L career · 9 lines in 2021
13%86%<1%
4.14
Stephanie Eells
48W–40L career · 6 lines in 2021
24%76%<1%
4.09
Ty Schmidt
109W–57L career · 1 line in 2021
5%94%1%
3.72
4
David Stoupa
44W–43L career · 2 lines in 2021
6%93%1%
3.71
Stephan Andersen
141W–107L career · 10 lines in 2021
15%84%<1%
3.63
Nicole Carmine
130W–111L career · 10 lines in 2021
51%49%<1%
3.50
3.5
Heidi Peirce
67W–64L career · 5 lines in 2021
4%94%2%
3.23
3.5
Barbara Scribner
58W–100L career · 2 lines in 2021
18%82%<1%
3.12
Nadia Gove
39W–31L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
Paul Spors
22W–15L career · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data
Thad Fineran
86W–54L career · 6 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.