Teams

Marion/65&Over7.0Men/Puckett/Johnson

2024 Marion Adult 65 & Over · 7.0 Adult Men 65 & Over

10 players · average NTRP 3.50 / REGION_2

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-03-14vs GV - JamesWon 10
W#1 DoublesDavid MacAdam / Winston Tulloch vs William Traylor / Blake Gall6-0, 3-6, 1-0
2024-03-07vs GV - JamesWon 10
W#1 DoublesJerry Johnson / Dennis Stasiak vs Stephen Bernard / Paul Bosco0-6, 6-2, 1-0
2024-03-02vs GV - JamesWon 20
W#1 DoublesJerry Johnson / Jim Clark vs Carlos Munoz / Robert Anglace6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesMark Davis / Winston Tulloch vs Robert Gisriel / Paul Bosco6-4, 7-5
2024-02-29vs GV - JamesWon 10
W#2 DoublesJerry Johnson / Glenn Hughes vs Carlos Munoz / Robert Anglace7-6, 7-6
2024-02-22vs GV - JamesLost 01
L#3 DoublesDavid MacAdam / Winston Tulloch vs Robert Kluemper / Ron Long0-6, 7-6, 0-1
2024-02-08vs GV - JamesWon 10
W#1 DoublesJerry Johnson / Tim Puckett vs William Traylor / Stephen Bernard6-3, 6-4
2024-02-03vs GV - JamesLost 01
L#2 DoublesJerry Johnson / Edward Wilson vs Ronnie McFarling / Terry Womack6-2, 5-7, 0-1
2024-01-18vs GV - JamesSplit 11
L#1 DoublesWinston Tulloch / Mark Davis vs Terry Womack / Blake Gall3-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesJerry Johnson / Edward Wilson vs Robert Gisriel / Ron Long6-2, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 Adult Men 65 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.42 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.44
Dennis Stasiak
published 3.5
3.42
David MacAdam
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Glenn Hughes
published
James Cernoch
published
Jerry Johnson
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Jim Clark
published
Mark Davis
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Perk Crain
published
Tim Puckett
published
William Meek
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mark Davis + Jerry Johnson033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Dennis Stasiak
3W–6L career · no lines in 2024
<1%68%32%
3.44
3.5
David MacAdam
61W–43L career · type A · 2 lines in 2024
<1%73%27%
3.42
Glenn Hughes
3W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
James Cernoch
1W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Jerry Johnson
68W–75L career · 6 lines in 2024
not enough data
Jim Clark
9W–6L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Mark Davis
17W–13L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Perk Crain
1W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Tim Puckett
3W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
William Meek
9W–6L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.