Teams

MRC:Smart AcesBudzynski/McGahren

2026 SCT Adult 18 & Over Women Winter · 2.5 W 1

9 players · average NTRP 2.50 / SOUTHERN CONNECTICUT

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
W#1 DoublesSusan Drakeley / Danielle MacCione vs Astrid Alvarez Clavijo / Kara Foster6-4, 7-6
W#2 DoublesAnn Budzynski / Stephanie Hamel vs Janet Striuli / Alyson Rourke6-4, 6-4
2026-02-01vs 4S:The Racquettes:Conklin/MaiseLost 12
W#1 DoublesDanielle MacCione / Susan Drakeley vs Michele Conklin / Elizabeth Seel6-2, 6-4
L#1 SinglesAnn Budzynski vs Alisa Dror4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesStephanie Hamel / Allison McGahren vs Andrea Calabrese / Linda Gross5-7, 2-6
2026-01-11vs WRC:No Strings Attached:DebnathWon 21
L#1 DoublesDanielle MacCione / Debbie Rosenthal vs Lori Barshop / Patricia Chen6-0, 4-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesAnn Budzynski vs Elizabeth Zhao6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesStephanie Hamel / Allison McGahren vs Laura Connell / Pallavi Debnath7-6, 6-1
2025-12-07vs TCT:2.5 Club ED:GodsillLost 12
L#1 DoublesAnn Budzynski / Christine Cocchiola vs Lihui Lin / Alison Godsill0-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesSusan Drakeley vs Anette Young6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesStephanie Hamel / Danielle MacCione vs Gloria Perez / Ambar Picon3-6, 6-4, 0-1
2025-11-23vs MIT:Milford Shaw/LorenzettiWon 21
L#1 DoublesStephanie Hamel / Danielle MacCione vs Estibaliz Garria / Jennifer Kuehn4-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesSusan Drakeley vs Holly Bernstein6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesAnn Sandercox / Allison McGahren vs Holly Gill / Gail Stevens7-6, 6-7
2025-10-26vs FIT:Fairfield Drop Shots:BrantWon 21
W#1 DoublesChristine Cocchiola / Debbie Rosenthal vs Veronica Matarese / Kristen Sasso6-4, 6-3
W#1 SinglesSusan Drakeley vs Marisa Pilipshen6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesDanielle MacCione / Donata Reeser vs Amy Holt / Clare Epstein2-6, 2-6
2025-09-28vs TRC:Tennis Tempest:ChenLost 12
L#1 DoublesChristine Cocchiola / Danielle MacCione vs Cindy Chen / Laura Hotchkiss0-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesAnn Budzynski vs Nancy Day6-2, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesStephanie Hamel / Allison McGahren vs Kimberly Grosso / Natallia Baranouskaya3-6, 2-6
2025-09-20vs CP:You've Got Served:KaplanLost 12
L#1 DoublesDebbie Rosenthal / Christine Cocchiola vs Emily Balevich / Anna Phelan4-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesSusan Drakeley vs Jessica Kooris2-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesAnn Budzynski / Allison McGahren vs Carrie Kaplan / Aisa Aiyer6-3, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings8 teams · 2.5 W 1
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1NC:Super Deuces 2.5:Isaza000000
2TCT:2.5 Racquettes:Buschauer/Langhan0815920173
3MRC:Smart AcesBudzynski/McGahren08121124208
4CP:You've Got Served:Kaplan08111224201
5TCT:2.5 Club ED:Godsill08121126188
6FIT:Fairfield Drop Shots:Brant08111227207
7MIT:Milford Shaw/Lorenzetti0891328215
84S:The Racquettes:Conklin/Maise0881530222

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.20 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.37
Susan Drakeley
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.34
Ann Budzynski
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.25
Danielle MacCione
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 2.5
Ann Sandercox
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.18
Debbie Rosenthal
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published 2.5
2.12
Allison McGahren
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.07
Stephanie Hamel
usually #2 Doubles 83%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published
2.07
Christine Cocchiola
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Donata Reeser
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Danielle MacCione + Christine Cocchiola0534% games−18.5% vs expected
Allison McGahren + Ann Budzynski3251% gamesnot enough data
Allison McGahren + Ann Sandercox134 matchesnot enough data
Allison McGahren + Stephanie Hamel123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Susan Drakeley
5W–1L career · 6 lines in 2026
0%83%17%
2.37
2.5
Ann Budzynski
9W–9L career · 6 lines in 2026
0%87%13%
2.34
2.5
Danielle MacCione
8W–12L career · 7 lines in 2026
0%96%4%
2.25
2.5
Ann Sandercox
5W–9L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
2.5
Debbie Rosenthal
33W–79L career · 7 lines in 2026
0%99%1%
2.18
2.5
Allison McGahren
9W–13L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.12
Stephanie Hamel
2W–4L career · 6 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.07
2.5
Christine Cocchiola
2W–15L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.07
Donata Reeser
0W–10L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.