Teams

SFV Magnificent 7

2022 Mixed 40 & Over - SFV · SFV 40 & Over - 7.0 MxD

13 players · average NTRP 3.62 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-06-12Won 10
W#2 DoublesStella Dumlao-Idea / Mauricio Muller vs Janice Miller / Gary Eisenhart6-3, 6-3
2022-06-11vs SFV Mixed NutsWon 10
W#2 DoublesMauricio Muller / Stella Dumlao-Idea vs Garen Amirganian / Andrea Fruits6-2, 7-5
2022-05-21vs SFV LLW - Team Ade - Ade QuingcoLost 01
L#2 DoublesDavid Lubnow / Keiko Kato Verrier vs Jane Caldito / Nick Alfonso6-7, 5-7
2022-05-07vs SFV Pure DriveWon 10
W#2 DoublesDavid Lubnow / Keiko Kato Verrier vs James Ordway / Tricia Kim6-2, 6-3
2022-04-30vs SFV Porter CrushersWon 10
W#2 DoublesTony Lujan / Stella Dumlao-Idea vs Charles Stevens / Sherry Gordon6-2, 6-2
2022-04-09vs SFV Braemar Mix & MatchLost 12
L#1 DoublesDavid Lubnow / Keiko Kato Verrier vs Keith Small / Mikaela Nagler6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesTony Lujan / Stella Dumlao-Idea vs Michael Cox / Michelle Parent3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#3 DoublesGonzalo Mendez / Larissa Kazantsev vs John Rubeli / Sharon Aguila0-6, 7-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SFV 40 & Over - 7.0 MxD have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.22 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.83
Summer Williamson
published
3.72
Teri Gustafson
published 4
3.53
Lisa Bourne
published
3.40
David Lubnow
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.22
Tony Lujan
published
3.15
Sanja Morris
published
3.11
Gonzalo Mendez
published 3.5
3.10
Keiko Kato Verrier
published
2.84
Stella Dumlao-Idea
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.83
Larissa Kazantsev
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.66
Molly Jackson
published
Ken Ho
published
RIO NINO GOMEZ
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Summer Williamson
49W–27L career · no lines in 2022
1%90%10%
3.83
4
Teri Gustafson
84W–67L career · no lines in 2022
5%94%2%
3.72
Lisa Bourne
9W–20L career · no lines in 2022
41%59%<1%
3.53
4
David Lubnow
73W–69L career · 3 lines in 2022
78%22%<1%
3.40
Tony Lujan
15W–8L career · no lines in 2022
5%94%2%
3.22
Sanja Morris
2W–1L career · no lines in 2022
12%87%<1%
3.15
3.5
Gonzalo Mendez
9W–7L career · no lines in 2022
21%79%<1%
3.11
Keiko Kato Verrier
5W–6L career · no lines in 2022
23%77%<1%
3.10
3
Stella Dumlao-Idea
180W–184L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%89%11%
2.84
Larissa Kazantsev
74W–65L career · 1 line in 2022
1%90%9%
2.83
Molly Jackson
14W–16L career · no lines in 2022
11%88%<1%
2.66
Ken Ho
0W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
RIO NINO GOMEZ
1W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.