Teams

3-DBaddour-CHCC

2022 Eno River Adult 40 & Over · 40 & Over Adult 4.0 Men-Evening

12 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2022-05-08vs 1-CCombs-CHTCLost 02
L#2 DoublesDavid Baddour / Paul Hodulik vs Steven Lebowitz / James Walsh2-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#3 DoublesVincent Aurentz / Jeff Tillman vs Chris Combs / Fabian Monrose4-6, 5-7
2022-05-05vs 2-RGriffin-EnoWon 20
W#1 DoublesDavid Baddour / Kenneth Nelson vs Richard Griffin / Jeffrey Kopf6-3, 6-0
W#3 DoublesVincent Aurentz / Richard Woods vs Cedric Taylor / Dan Dillon6-3, 6-0
2022-04-19Won 10
W#2 DoublesDavid Baddour / Paul Hodulik vs Daniel Berman / John Tucker6-2, 2-6, 1-0
2022-04-14vs 2-RGriffin-EnoWon 10
W#2 DoublesVincent Aurentz / Richard Woods vs Richard Griffin / Jeffrey Kopf6-3, 6-2
2022-04-07vs 1-CCombs-CHTCLost 02
L#2 DoublesDavid Baddour / Jeff Tillman vs Reed Breneman / James Walsh5-7, 4-6
L#3 DoublesVincent Aurentz / Richard Woods vs Fabian Monrose / Nathan Bearman2-6, 6-4, 0-1
2022-03-29vs 4-Henley-HVCCWon 10
W#3 DoublesVincent Aurentz / Richard Woods vs Mark Anderson / John Burkert7-6, 6-3
2022-03-22vs 1-CCombs-CHTCSplit 11
W#1 DoublesDavid Baddour / Paul Hodulik vs Nathan Bearman / Fabian Monrose6-4, 6-3
L#3 DoublesVincent Aurentz / Brice Englert vs Scott Williams / Steven Lebowitz3-6, 0-6
2022-03-17vs 2-RGriffin-EnoWon 10
W#3 DoublesVincent Aurentz / Richard Woods vs Jeffrey Kopf / Cedric Taylor6-2, 6-2
2022-03-03Won 10
W#1 DoublesDavid Baddour / Christian Shelby vs Todd Hill / Christian Lundblad6-2, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40 & Over Adult 4.0 Men-Evening have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.76 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.23
Christian Shelby
published 4.5
4.19
Kenneth Nelson
published
3.91
Chris Hanes
published 4
3.82
Paul Hodulik
published
3.82
David Baddour
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.81
Daniel Estay
published 4
3.76
Jeff Tillman
published
3.73
B Davies
published 4
3.65
Gary Masse
published 4
3.52
Vincent Aurentz
usually #3 Doubles 86%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published 4
3.43
Richard Woods
published
3.23
Brice Englert
published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

David Baddour + Paul Hodulik5158% games+13.6% vs expected
Kenneth Nelson + Christian Shelby4255% games−2.6% vs expected
Jeff Tillman + Paul Hodulik314 matchesnot enough data
Jeff Tillman + David Baddour213 matchesnot enough data
Jeff Tillman + Vincent Aurentz213 matchesnot enough data
David Baddour + Richard Woods213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Christian Shelby
9W–6L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
4.23
Kenneth Nelson
6W–10L career · no lines in 2022
7%92%1%
4.19
4
Chris Hanes
11W–10L career · no lines in 2022
<1%75%25%
3.91
Paul Hodulik
11W–5L career · no lines in 2022
1%91%9%
3.82
4
David Baddour
125W–97L career · 6 lines in 2022
1%91%8%
3.82
4
Daniel Estay
2W–1L career · type S · no lines in 2022
1%92%7%
3.81
Jeff Tillman
16W–14L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%3%
3.76
4
B Davies
2W–4L career · type S · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.73
4
Gary Masse
1W–3L career · type S · no lines in 2022
13%87%<1%
3.65
4
Vincent Aurentz
44W–45L career · 7 lines in 2022
45%55%<1%
3.52
Richard Woods
18W–17L career · no lines in 2022
<1%71%29%
3.43
3.5
Brice Englert
4W–8L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.23

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.