Teams

Buckhorn Doubleshots - J. Torres

2023 Hillsborough Mixed 40 & Over · 7.0 Mixed 40 and Over

11 players · average NTRP 3.33 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-02-26vs Hills / R. Helme / 40&Over7.0MXDLost 01
L#1 DoublesJoe Izzo / Margarita Colon vs Jaime Villegas / Tina Sturdevant1-6, 6-4, 0-1
2023-02-19vs HCC - DonahueLost 01
L#3 DoublesMargarita Colon / Joe Izzo vs Kirsten Willis / Edward Lindblom1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesJoe Izzo / Grace Greyson vs Mark Nelson / Jeanne Crofton2-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesJavid Lateef / Margareta Henderson vs Michael Irving / Marie Yaghoobian6-0, 3-6, 1-0
2023-02-05vs Hunters Green - E. VickersWon 10
W#2 DoublesJoe Izzo / Grace Greyson vs Sean Friday / Ann Coston6-4, 6-4
2023-01-29vs GH - Cardona-HillerLost 03
L#1 DoublesJavid Lateef / Cealene Stone vs Beatriz Cardona / Roberto Hiller2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesDonald Williams / Kimberly Funk vs Lourdes Bacardi / Jeffrey Rodriguez6-1, 5-7, 0-1
L#3 DoublesScott Tashman / Carol Guido vs Mehmet Turantekin / Estrella Rodriguez2-6, 2-6
2023-01-22vs Cheval Aces and Sevens - L. HannaLost 01
L#2 DoublesTeresa Manganello / Joe Izzo vs Marija Seovic / Aleksandar Seovic6-7, 2-6
2023-01-08vs HCC Overhead Squad - R. RossLost 01
L#1 DoublesKimberly Funk / Joe Izzo vs Chris Sorensen / Kristen Shinners4-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 Mixed 40 and Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.18 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.37
Javid Lateef
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.36
Teresa Manganello
published
3.27
Kimberly Funk
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.26
Margarita Colon
published
3.26
Scott Tashman
published
Grace Greyson
published 3.5
3.17
Carol Guido
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.13
Joe Izzo
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.98
Margareta Henderson
published
2.82
Susan MOSHER
published
Cealene Stone
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Joe Izzo + Kimberly Funk134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Javid Lateef
38W–122L career · 2 lines in 2023
85%15%<1%
3.37
Teresa Manganello
3W–11L career · no lines in 2023
<1%86%14%
3.36
Kimberly Funk
106W–112L career · 2 lines in 2023
2%94%4%
3.27
Margarita Colon
8W–3L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%3%
3.26
Scott Tashman
2W–5L career · no lines in 2023
2%95%3%
3.26
3.5
Grace Greyson
2W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3.5
Carol Guido
232W–216L career · 1 line in 2023
10%90%1%
3.17
Joe Izzo
126W–178L career · 6 lines in 2023
15%85%<1%
3.13
Margareta Henderson
2W–5L career · no lines in 2023
57%43%<1%
2.98
Susan MOSHER
16W–18L career · no lines in 2023
1%91%8%
2.82
3
Cealene Stone
0W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.