Teams

MAC-Casebeer

2021 Adult 40 & Over · 3.0 Women

8 players · average NTRP 3.5 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.30 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.70
Jeri Finn
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.43
Tove Maloco
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.41
Jennifer Stevenson
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.40
Katie Jurgenson
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.35
Andrea Lamprecht
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Kayla Casebeer
usually #1 Singles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.13
Sarah Robertson
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.72
Madeleine Bourland
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
Results6 ties
2021-07-25Won 31
W#1 DoublesTove Maloco / Rachel Young vs Rosie Francis / Tracey Hodgson6-2, 6-3
L#1 SinglesKayla Casebeer vs Jennifer Potter6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesKay Hallmark / Sarah Robertson vs Barbara Dusicka / Stephany Mo7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesKatie Jurgenson / Andrea Lamprecht vs Rachel Emery / Gail Bolte6-3, 6-4
2021-07-18Won 40
W#1 DoublesTove Maloco / Jeri Finn vs Jennifer Johnson / Claire C Gates6-1, 6-2
W#1 SinglesKatie Jurgenson vs Leslie Cole6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesElizabeth Burns / Sarah Robertson vs Jennifer Steward / Katherine Fisher6-0, 6-2
W#3 DoublesMadeleine Bourland / Jennifer Stevenson vs Kate Quisling / Kathleen Crowley6-4, 6-4
2021-07-17Won 40
W#1 DoublesJeri Finn / Rachel Young vs Jing Li / Lupine Swanson6-2, 6-3
W#1 SinglesKatie Jurgenson vs Nicole Smith6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesElizabeth Burns / Sarah Robertson vs Rachel Nies / Susan Bradley6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMadeleine Bourland / Jennifer Stevenson vs Dipali Dixit / Jennifer Weaver6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2021-07-11Won 21
W#1 DoublesJeri Finn / Tove Maloco vs Rochelle Pluymers / Rebecca Griffith6-2, 6-4
W#1 SinglesKatie Jurgenson vs Nicola Ash6-1, 6-1
L#2 DoublesMadeleine Bourland / Jennifer Stevenson vs Carol Glenn / Wendi Ouellette3-6, 7-5, 1-0
2021-06-27Won 40
W#1 DoublesKatie Jurgenson / Andrea Lamprecht vs Nicole Norby / Erin Canova6-3, 6-2
W#1 SinglesKayla Casebeer vs Tina Kriebaum6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesJulie Motschenbacher / Jeri Finn vs Penny Luong / Vanessa Gallant6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesMadeleine Bourland / Kay Hallmark vs Minhhang Tran / Shuping Li6-1, 6-3
2021-06-13Won 21
L#1 DoublesSarah Robertson / Elizabeth Burns vs Susan Robblee / Kim Tellin6-4, 6-4
W#1 SinglesJeri Finn vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesKayla Casebeer / Rachel Young vs KUSUM ASUDANI / Jeannette Martinez4-6, 6-3, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4
Jeri Finn
149W–71L career
2%98%0%
3.70
3.5
Tove Maloco
86W–43L career
0%93%7%
3.43
3.5
Jennifer Stevenson
91W–97L career
0%96%4%
3.41
3.5
Katie Jurgenson
84W–60L career
0%95%5%
3.40
3.5
Andrea Lamprecht
55W–48L career
0%98%2%
3.35
3.5
Kayla Casebeer
93W–63L career
not enough data
3.5
Sarah Robertson
72W–98L career
9%91%0%
3.13
3
Madeleine Bourland
64W–53L career
2%98%0%
2.72

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.