Teams

IE-LLW-MTC-Shelter

2023 SCTA Tri-Level 18 & Over - IE · IE Women 4.0

9 players · average NTRP 3.67 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-09-10vs IE-CL-ThompsonSplit 11
W#1 DoublesNyiemah Smoke / Rebecca Cloyd vs Melissa Connor / Keiko Dodge6-1, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesStacy Westfall / Alicia Larson vs Julie Sell / Danette Conlin6-4, 4-6, 0-1
2023-08-26vs IE-CL-ThompsonWon 20
W#1 DoublesRebecca Cloyd / Judy Henning vs Keiko Dodge / Monica Johnson6-4, 6-1
W#3 DoublesKelsey Cane / Alicia Larson vs Tina Maslach / Satoko Parsons6-2, 6-0
2023-08-06vs IE-BC-BorresenWon 10
W#1 DoublesRebecca Cloyd / Nyiemah Smoke vs CHARLOTTE DEHESA / Cristina Leivas3-6, 7-6, 1-0
2023-07-30vs IE-Elevenis-JohnsonLost 01
L#1 DoublesRebecca Cloyd / Nyiemah Smoke vs Elvia Quintana / Jane Whitney2-6, 2-6
2023-07-23vs IE-Elevenis-JohnsonWon 10
W#3 DoublesStacy Westfall / Alicia Larson vs GINA SKIBAR / Alondra Klemme3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2023-07-08vs IE-BC-BorresenWon 10
W#1 DoublesRebecca Cloyd / Nyiemah Smoke vs Josie Hendrix / Mindy Pfenning6-3, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for IE Women 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.33 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.74
Rebecca Cloyd
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.70
Kim Wellman
published
3.60
Kelsey Cane
published
3.60
Judy Henning
published
3.58
Andrea Van Soest
published 4
3.22
Mary Ann Neder
published
3.06
Alicia Larson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.76
Stacy Westfall
published
2.71
Jennivieve Randolph
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Rebecca Cloyd
92W–94L career · 5 lines in 2023
4%93%3%
3.74
Kim Wellman
2W–8L career · no lines in 2023
8%91%2%
3.70
Kelsey Cane
0W–4L career · no lines in 2023
23%77%<1%
3.60
Judy Henning
3W–5L career · no lines in 2023
24%75%<1%
3.60
4
Andrea Van Soest
33W–38L career · type A · no lines in 2023
28%72%<1%
3.58
Mary Ann Neder
1W–4L career · no lines in 2023
98%2%<1%
3.22
3
Alicia Larson
59W–48L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%32%68%
3.06
Stacy Westfall
9W–10L career · no lines in 2023
3%92%5%
2.76
Jennivieve Randolph
7W–10L career · no lines in 2023
7%91%2%
2.71

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.