Teams

MT/HOLDEN/TRILEVEL/M3.0/3.5/4.0

2025 Tri Level · Tri Level Bozeman Men 3.0

6 players · average NTRP 3.50 / MONTANA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-08-09vs All Your FaultsWon 30
W#1 DoublesDeric Holden / Gavin Holden vs Jesse Phillips / Peter Votruba6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesLuke Holden / Dominick Ryan vs Brandon Moore / Robert Brooks6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesBen Reeves / Kyle Wherry vs David Dearth / Naldy Hans Steev Celestin6-3, 6-4
2025-08-08vs All Your FaultsWon 21
L#1 DoublesGavin Holden / Deric Holden vs Peter Votruba / Jesse Phillips6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesDominick Ryan / Luke Holden vs Brandon Moore / Robert Brooks6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesBen Reeves / Kyle Wherry vs David Dearth / Naldy Hans Steev Celestin6-2, 6-3
2025-08-08vs All Your FaultsWon 21
L#1 DoublesDeric Holden / Gavin Holden vs Jesse Phillips / Peter Votruba6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesDominick Ryan / Luke Holden vs Brandon Moore / Robert Brooks6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesBen Reeves / Kyle Wherry vs David Dearth / Naldy Hans Steev Celestin6-4, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · Tri Level Bozeman Men 3.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1MT/HOLDEN/TRILEVEL/M3.0/3.5/4.03072460
2All Your Faults032716101

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Ben Reeves
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Deric Holden
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Dominick Ryan
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Gavin Holden
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Kyle Wherry
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Luke Holden
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ben Reeves + Kyle Wherry303 matchesnot enough data
Deric Holden + Gavin Holden123 matchesnot enough data
Dominick Ryan + Luke Holden303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Ben Reeves
3W–0L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Deric Holden
1W–2L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Dominick Ryan
3W–0L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Gavin Holden
1W–2L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Kyle Wherry
3W–0L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Luke Holden
6W–0L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.