Teams

Marco YMCA - K. Lewis

2022 Collier Adult 65 & Over Winter · 6.0 Adult 65 & over - Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.20 / REGION_7

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-03-08vs Pelican Marsh - MushockLost 01
L#1 DoublesKaren Lewis / Pattie Yergler vs Beth Gilman / Annie Potts6-4, 4-6, 0-1
2022-03-01vs Island Walk - ConawayWon 10
W#1 DoublesDeb Dorsey / Pattie Yergler vs Margaret Egger / Gale Neuner6-1, 6-4
L#2 DoublesCelia Bolzani / Pattie Yergler vs Janet Olliges / Karen Shmihluk6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2022-02-08vs Island Walk - ConawayWon 10
W#1 DoublesSally Mattke / Pattie Yergler vs Mary Conaway / Gale Neuner6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesSusan Rafferty / Pattie Yergler vs Janet Olliges / Melanie Rose3-6, 5-7
2022-01-25Won 10
W#3 DoublesSusan Rafferty / Eva Dotti vs Rhonda Noble / Lynne Peterman6-7, 6-3, 1-0
2022-01-18vs Island Walk - ConawayWon 10
W#2 DoublesEva Dotti / Susan Rafferty vs Margaret Egger / Louise Gallagher6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W#1 DoublesSally Mattke / Pattie Yergler vs Janet Olliges / Melanie Rose6-0, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.0 Adult 65 & over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.83 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.30
Deb Dorsey
published 3.5
3.21
Pattie Yergler
usually #1 Doubles 64%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.11
Sally Mattke
published
2.62
Eva Dotti
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.61
Laura Hansmann
published
2.60
Celia Bolzani
published 3
2.59
Claire Babrowski
published 3
2.59
Susan Rafferty
published
Kimberly Maly
published
Patty Martell
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Laura Hansmann + Susan Rafferty3354% games+2.7% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Deb Dorsey
35W–21L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.30
3.5
Pattie Yergler
220W–127L career · 14 lines in 2022
5%94%1%
3.21
Sally Mattke
10W–11L career · no lines in 2022
19%80%<1%
3.11
3
Eva Dotti
49W–55L career · 2 lines in 2022
18%82%<1%
2.62
Laura Hansmann
13W–26L career · no lines in 2022
19%80%<1%
2.61
3
Celia Bolzani
7W–20L career · no lines in 2022
22%78%<1%
2.60
3
Claire Babrowski
2W–4L career · no lines in 2022
25%75%<1%
2.59
Susan Rafferty
5W–16L career · no lines in 2022
25%75%<1%
2.59
Kimberly Maly
8W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Patty Martell
16W–21L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.