Teams

Match Masters

2025 Corpus Christi USPTA Fall League · Mens 3.5 Flight

13 players · average NTRP 3.67 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2024-11-21vs Make It A DoubleSplit 22
L#1 DoublesMark Tapia / Albert Arriaga vs Bart Nelms / John Rice4-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesJack Antes vs Brandon Enderle0-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesIzaiah Jimenez-Chino / Mikkel Bahamondes vs Chad Dittman / James Sales6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesJoe Puente / Steven Solis vs Gary Cosgrove / Maximilian Walker6-3, 6-0
2024-11-07vs River Warriors 3.5Won 41
L#1 DoublesMark Tapia / Albert Arriaga vs Bill Smith / Solomon Rios6-7, 0-6
W#1 SinglesJack Antes vs Ernesto Monroy3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJoe Puente / Steven Solis vs Andrew Boucher / Alexander Aitken6-1, 6-2
W#2 SinglesChandra Sanwal vs Jinlong Wang6-0, 6-2
W#3 DoublesIzaiah Jimenez-Chino / Ben Perer vs Khoa Le / Miguel Aceves6-2, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Mens 3.5 Flight have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.33 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.84
Miguel Valdez
published
3.56
Tyler Milanowski
published
3.43
Tim Massmann
published
3.43
Chandra Sanwal
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.33
Ben Perer
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.33
Albert Arriaga
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.31
Steven Solis
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.15
Ryan Read
published
3.09
Mark Tapia
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.08
Jack Antes
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.04
Joe Puente
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Izaiah Jimenez-Chino
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Mikkel Bahamondes
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mark Tapia + Albert Arriaga134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Miguel Valdez
18W–8L career · no lines in 2025
1%86%13%
3.84
Tyler Milanowski
28W–8L career · no lines in 2025
<1%34%66%
3.56
Tim Massmann
6W–6L career · no lines in 2025
<1%70%30%
3.43
3.5
Chandra Sanwal
28W–19L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%70%30%
3.43
3.5
Ben Perer
9W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
1%87%12%
3.33
4
Albert Arriaga
5W–14L career · 2 lines in 2025
89%11%<1%
3.33
Steven Solis
9W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%90%9%
3.31
Ryan Read
14W–19L career · no lines in 2025
<1%14%86%
3.15
Mark Tapia
31W–36L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%26%74%
3.09
Jack Antes
10W–14L career · 2 lines in 2025
28%72%<1%
3.08
Joe Puente
19W–31L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%38%62%
3.04
Izaiah Jimenez-Chino
3W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Mikkel Bahamondes
2W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.