Teams

Kiker/Traskwood/OC

2026 Adult 18 & Over Spring 1 League · 2.5 Men

6 players · average NTRP 3.00 / ARKANSAS

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-04-27vs DGarretson/LR/BPWon 20
W#1 DoublesAshton Green / Rush Francis vs Jay Barth / Logan Parke6-0, 6-2
W#2 DoublesAleksandr Krakhalev / Cory Meek vs Douglas Yee / Peyton Williams6-3, 6-3
2026-04-21vs Vandenberg/LR/RebsWon 20
W#1 DoublesRush Francis / Ashton Green vs Matt Vandenberg / Peter Albahsous6-0, 6-0
W#1 SinglesAleksandr Krakhalev vs Evan Zhang6-1, 6-3
2026-04-14vs DGarretson/LR/BPSplit 11
W#1 DoublesAshton Green / Rush Francis vs Logan Parke / Chad Taylor6-1, 6-1
L#1 SinglesJackson Kiker vs Andrew Stone6-2, 1-6, 1-0
2026-04-06vs Vandenberg/LR/RebsWon 30
W#1 DoublesRush Francis / Ashton Green vs Jason Nguyen / Cory Smith6-0, 7-6
W#1 SinglesAleksandr Krakhalev vs Evan Zhang2-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#2 DoublesCory Meek / Jackson Kiker vs Matt Vandenberg / Jefferson Mcrae6-4, 6-2
2026-04-01vs Vandenberg/LR/RebsWon 30
W#1 DoublesAshton Green / Rush Francis vs Nelson Ha / Tristan Garner6-2, 6-3
W#1 SinglesAleksandr Krakhalev vs Evan Zhang6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesCory Meek / Jackson Kiker vs Harrison Hudson / Peter Albahsous6-1, 6-0
2026-03-19vs DGarretson/LR/BPWon 21
W#1 DoublesAshton Green / Rush Francis vs Campbell Mclaurin / Joshua Wilson6-7, 6-1, 1-0
L#1 SinglesAleksandr Krakhalev vs Logan Parke2-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesJackson Kiker / Cory Meek vs Nez Erkman / Julius Gerard6-0, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.45 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Brandon Kiker
published 4.5
2.54
Ashton Green
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.51
Cory Meek
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.49
Rush Francis
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.40
Jackson Kiker
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
2.30
Aleksandr Krakhalev
usually #1 Singles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ashton Green + Rush Francis6076% gamesnot enough data
Jackson Kiker + Cory Meek303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Brandon Kiker
1W–4L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
2.5
Ashton Green
7W–0L career · type S · 6 lines in 2026
0%38%62%
2.54
2.5
Cory Meek
9W–0L career · type S · 4 lines in 2026
0%48%52%
2.51
Rush Francis
6W–0L career · 6 lines in 2026
0%53%47%
2.49
Jackson Kiker
5W–1L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%75%25%
2.40
2.5
Aleksandr Krakhalev
10W–13L career · type S · 5 lines in 2026
0%93%7%
2.30

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.