Teams

Willowfork - Fork ‘Em Up

2025 HTA Spring NA - Ladies Doubles Friday · 3.5

15 players · average NTRP 3.50 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-04-04vs Wilchester - Ad-InLost 13
L#1 DoublesAndrea Verges / Allie Kristensen vs Mariana Bustillos / Erin Burnett2-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJacklyn Hebert / Nora Lebedzinski vs Cindy Rabe / Misty Smith Riffer3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesKatherine Rowe / Jolena Tu vs Patrizia Papaianni / Carolina Dominguez4-6, 3-6
W#4 DoublesGeeta Parmar-patel / Michelle Huntsman vs Courtney Steinfeld / Michele Foster1-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#1 DoublesMaggy Britton / Geeta Parmar-patel vs Anna Kelley / Kelly Kinch1-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesKatherine Rowe / Nathalie Tirtiaux vs Cassie Oppman / Luana Pereira6-4, 6-2
L#3 DoublesJolena Tu / Michelle Huntsman vs Joy Ku / Mindy Cabble2-6, 2-6
2025-01-31vs Wilchester - Ad-InLost 04
L#1 DoublesMichelle Huntsman / Allie Kristensen vs Kathy Douglass / Mariana Bustillos0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesNora Lebedzinski / Jolena Tu vs Carolina Dominguez / Cindy Rabe2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesJacklyn Hebert / Nathalie Tirtiaux vs Misty Smith Riffer / Alice Chort4-6, 3-6
L#4 DoublesHillary Brink / Maggy Britton vs Monica Creixell / Courtney Steinfeld6-2, 1-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.23 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.55
Andrea Verges
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.45
Michelle Huntsman
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #4 Doubles 33% · published
3.43
Kim Kuzawa
published
3.27
Nathalie Tirtiaux
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.22
Kate Olsen
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published
3.21
Lindsay Catterall
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.19
Maggy Britton
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #4 Doubles 50% · published
3.19
Jennifer Korando
published
3.18
Jacklyn Hebert
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.16
Nora Lebedzinski
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.13
Jolena Tu
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.13
Geeta Parmar-patel
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #4 Doubles 50% · published
3.08
Allie Kristensen
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.04
Katherine Rowe
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Hillary Brink
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kim Kuzawa + Jennifer Korando3255% games−4.4% vs expected
Kim Kuzawa + Lindsay Catterall1441% games−5.9% vs expected
Lindsay Catterall + Andrea Verges4152% gamesnot enough data
Kim Kuzawa + Andrea Verges404 matchesnot enough data
Kate Olsen + Nathalie Tirtiaux224 matchesnot enough data
Lindsay Catterall + Jennifer Korando123 matchesnot enough data
Katherine Rowe + Maggy Britton213 matchesnot enough data
Katherine Rowe + Nathalie Tirtiaux213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Andrea Verges
62W–63L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%36%64%
3.55
Michelle Huntsman
26W–16L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%64%36%
3.45
Kim Kuzawa
61W–50L career · no lines in 2025
<1%69%31%
3.43
Nathalie Tirtiaux
19W–14L career · 2 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.27
Kate Olsen
24W–25L career · 1 line in 2025
6%92%2%
3.22
Lindsay Catterall
26W–47L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%6%94%
3.21
Maggy Britton
16W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%8%92%
3.19
Jennifer Korando
26W–31L career · no lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.19
Jacklyn Hebert
6W–13L career · 2 lines in 2025
10%89%1%
3.18
Nora Lebedzinski
32W–45L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%12%88%
3.16
Jolena Tu
17W–21L career · 3 lines in 2025
17%83%<1%
3.13
Geeta Parmar-patel
4W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
17%82%<1%
3.13
3.5
Allie Kristensen
1W–12L career · type S · 2 lines in 2025
28%72%<1%
3.08
Katherine Rowe
14W–26L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%39%61%
3.04
Hillary Brink
2W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.