Teams

14 WW Combs-Pokrywka

2025 Richmond Adult 40 & Over Weekday Women · Richmond Adult 40 & Over Weekday 3.5 Women

14 players · average NTRP 3.50 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-07-11vs 4 TDC SpillareLost 03
L#1 DoublesAlysa Cargiulo / Jessica Parrent vs Anna Gibellato / Kaitlin Marschke5-7, 0-6
L#2 DoublesJennifer Combs-Pokrywka / Colleen Quinn vs Nathalie Stephens / Stephanie Marcus3-6, 1-5
L#3 DoublesKaren Viverette / Erin Gardner vs Laura Wheeler / Meigan Sullivan1-6, 6-1, 0-1
2025-06-18vs 5 Hermitage Stinson/BerentsSplit 22
L#1 DoublesErin Gardner / Carin Krawitz vs Joanna Bergeron / Beth Stinson0-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesMary Douglas Rice vs Elizabeth Wiertel6-1, 6-1
L#2 DoublesJennifer Combs-Pokrywka / Jessica Parrent vs Amy Click / Lisa Frazier6-7, 1-6
W#3 DoublesSuzanne Ley / Karen Viverette vs Virginia Berents / Elizabeth Betz6-2, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Adult 40 & Over Weekday 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.18 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.40
Louise McCool
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.38
Jessica Parrent
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
3.32
Elizabeth Keith
published
3.28
Amy Ringberg
published 3.5
3.27
Alysa Cargiulo
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.22
Meghan Dexter
published
3.17
Suzanne Ley
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.11
Erica Kaplan
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.10
Carin Krawitz
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.08
Mary Douglas Rice
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.06
Karen Viverette
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.00
Erin Gardner
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.92
Jennifer Combs-Pokrywka
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Mary Wood
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jessica Parrent + Alysa Cargiulo213 matchesnot enough data
Karen Viverette + Suzanne Ley123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Louise McCool
29W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%75%25%
3.40
Jessica Parrent
27W–14L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%80%20%
3.38
Elizabeth Keith
4W–5L career · no lines in 2025
1%89%10%
3.32
3.5
Amy Ringberg
10W–6L career · no lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.28
3.5
Alysa Cargiulo
20W–6L career · 4 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.27
Meghan Dexter
27W–15L career · no lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.22
Suzanne Ley
23W–15L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%12%88%
3.17
Erica Kaplan
15W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
21%78%<1%
3.11
3.5
Carin Krawitz
3W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
23%77%<1%
3.10
Mary Douglas Rice
27W–7L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%28%72%
3.08
Karen Viverette
11W–12L career · 2 lines in 2025
34%66%<1%
3.06
Erin Gardner
12W–23L career · 2 lines in 2025
49%51%<1%
3.00
Jennifer Combs-Pokrywka
3W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
72%28%<1%
2.92
Mary Wood
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.