Teams

Broward/Koon

2022 Broward Adult 18 & Over - Spring Day · 4.0 Adult 18 & Over Women

12 players · average NTRP 4.17 / REGION_8

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
W#1 DoublesGloria Coursey / Clarena Furtado vs Elena Sise / Michele King3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesChristine Holcomb / Sahar Moghaddam vs Hania Majzoub / Upasna Jha4-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesVladlena Funk / Maria Montoto vs Loren Levine / Laurie Mathews6-4, 5-7, 1-0
2022-06-16vs Parkland Champions - DanaWon 40
W#1 DoublesGloria Coursey / Clarena Furtado vs Heidi Boncher / Daniele Vuksic6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesIna Gluck / Maria Montoto vs Kris Black / Ashley Cohn6-2, 7-5
W#2 SinglesCindy Zimmerman vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesIvy Touchstone / Lorena Villar vs Amy DeLoach / Tatiana Roosli6-4, 6-2
2022-06-02vs Veltri - Gonzalez/ContrerasWon 31
L#1 DoublesLou Armstrong / Lorena Villar vs Maria Galvan Leeper / Samie Lesperance4-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesGloria Coursey / Clarena Furtado vs Morayma Remigio / Sarah Nickoson6-0, 6-1
W#2 SinglesKimberly OMahony vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesIna Gluck / Ivy Touchstone vs Natalia Frantsevskaya / Elizabeth Smalley6-7, 6-4, 1-0
2022-05-26vs Veltri - ChenWon 20
W#2 DoublesClarena Furtado / Gloria Coursey vs Yonghong Chen / Renate Wilson6-2, 6-0
W#3 DoublesVladlena Funk / Lorena Villar vs Maria Brozzi / Patricia Velez6-1, 4-6, 1-0
L#1 DoublesLou Armstrong / Maria Montoto vs Elena Sise / Upasna Jha5-7, 6-7
W#2 DoublesLorena Villar / Christine Holcomb vs Svetlana Janglin / Paulina Carney6-1, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesIvy Touchstone / Clarena Furtado vs NOOR BLAZEKOVIC MENDOZA / Lori Schlam6-3, 6-1
2022-05-05vs Parkland Champions - DanaWon 21
L#1 DoublesChristine Holcomb / Lorena Villar vs Daniele Vuksic / Heidi Boncher5-7, 4-6
W#2 DoublesGloria Coursey / Clarena Furtado vs Kris Black / Ashley Cohn3-6, 6-0, 1-0
W#3 DoublesIna Gluck / Ivy Touchstone vs Amy DeLoach / Tatiana Roosli6-2, 6-1
2022-04-21vs Veltri - Gonzalez/ContrerasWon 30
W#1 DoublesIna Gluck / Maria Montoto vs Natalia Frantsevskaya / Sarah Nickoson6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesLou Armstrong / Sahar Moghaddam vs ELIZABETH GORDILLO / Zorayda Hidalgo6-1, 6-0
W#3 DoublesVladlena Funk / Cindy Zimmerman vs Kerri Paul / Ana Carolina Manchester4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2022-04-14vs Veltri - ChenWon 30
W#1 DoublesSahar Moghaddam / Vladlena Funk vs Carolina Small / Renate Wilson6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesKim Allen / Ivy Touchstone vs Erlinda Gomez / Sondra Carpio7-5, 6-2
W#3 DoublesLou Armstrong / Kimberly OMahony vs Maria Brozzi / Yonghong Chen6-4, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Adult 18 & Over Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.83 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.04
Gloria Coursey
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4.5
4.03
Ivy Touchstone
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4.5
4.02
Kimberly OMahony
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 4.5
4.00
Sahar Moghaddam
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.98
Maria Montoto
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.93
Suzanne Siegler
published
3.80
Ina Gluck
published 4
3.79
Lorena Villar
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.65
Clarena Furtado
published 4
3.61
Lou Armstrong
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.56
Kathy Koon
published
3.53
Cindy Zimmerman
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 4
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Gloria Coursey + Ivy Touchstone7554% games+2.7% vs expected
Maria Montoto + Sahar Moghaddam4261% games+1.3% vs expected
Ivy Touchstone + Maria Montoto11455% games−3.0% vs expected
Lou Armstrong + Lorena Villar5651% gamesnot enough data
Lou Armstrong + Cindy Zimmerman2344% gamesnot enough data
Gloria Coursey + Lorena Villar3250% gamesnot enough data
Lorena Villar + Ivy Touchstone3251% gamesnot enough data
Lorena Villar + Sahar Moghaddam3266% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Gloria Coursey
103W–52L career · 5 lines in 2022
38%62%<1%
4.04
4.5
Ivy Touchstone
129W–82L career · 5 lines in 2022
42%58%<1%
4.03
4.5
Kimberly OMahony
77W–46L career · 2 lines in 2022
44%55%<1%
4.02
4
Sahar Moghaddam
280W–189L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%51%49%
4.00
4
Maria Montoto
252W–120L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%56%44%
3.98
Suzanne Siegler
3W–3L career · no lines in 2022
71%29%<1%
3.93
4
Ina Gluck
6W–1L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.80
4
Lorena Villar
207W–130L career · 5 lines in 2022
1%93%5%
3.79
4
Clarena Furtado
12W–15L career · no lines in 2022
13%87%<1%
3.65
Lou Armstrong
61W–85L career · 4 lines in 2022
21%79%<1%
3.61
Kathy Koon
4W–15L career · no lines in 2022
32%68%<1%
3.56
4
Cindy Zimmerman
27W–55L career · type S · 2 lines in 2022
41%59%<1%
3.53

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.