Teams

SUNNYVALE TC/SUNNYVALE MTC 40MX6.0A

2025 MIXED 40&Over · 40&Over MX6.0

17 players · average NTRP 2.50 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
W#2 DoublesKwok Yin Chan / Julie Johnson vs Eileen Gann / Jiye Wu6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesShane Denamur / Amita Mukerji vs Digger Floris / Tess Byler6-1, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40&Over MX6.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.00 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.48
Jessica Yu
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.41
Pauline Teunissen
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.34
Lisa Baumert
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.27
Kerry Loftus
published
3.23
Elizabeth Olson
published
3.15
Kwok Yin Chan
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.01
Sheila Hutchinson
published
2.98
Julie Johnson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.98
Matthew Derby
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.91
Shane Denamur
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.85
Khalid Beg
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.82
Michel Schreurs
published
2.82
Sandra Ballestrasse
published
2.67
Rizwan Niazi
published
2.60
Rie Collett
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.46
Amita Mukerji
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Lynn DeNamur
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Pauline Teunissen + Michel Schreurs033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jessica Yu
122W–68L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%55%45%
3.48
Pauline Teunissen
21W–22L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%75%25%
3.41
Lisa Baumert
34W–33L career · 1 line in 2025
1%87%13%
3.34
Kerry Loftus
17W–15L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.27
Elizabeth Olson
30W–12L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.23
Kwok Yin Chan
13W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
14%85%1%
3.15
Sheila Hutchinson
13W–30L career · no lines in 2025
48%52%<1%
3.01
Julie Johnson
29W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%55%45%
2.98
Matthew Derby
13W–14L career · 1 line in 2025
57%43%<1%
2.98
Shane Denamur
14W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
74%26%<1%
2.91
Khalid Beg
19W–23L career · 1 line in 2025
1%86%13%
2.85
Michel Schreurs
15W–19L career · no lines in 2025
1%89%10%
2.82
Sandra Ballestrasse
16W–21L career · no lines in 2025
1%89%10%
2.82
Rizwan Niazi
14W–5L career · no lines in 2025
12%87%1%
2.67
Rie Collett
17W–16L career · 1 line in 2025
24%76%<1%
2.60
2.5
Amita Mukerji
15W–16L career · 1 line in 2025
0%62%38%
2.46
Lynn DeNamur
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.