Teams

Liberty Park Tennis-White

2024 Fall Outdoor League-Saturday · 4.0M

10 players · average NTRP 4.00 / UTAH

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-10-24vs Eccles Tennis Center-DalpeSplit 22
W#1 DoublesNicholas Geer / Kasen Wright vs Jerad Amundsen / Matthew Wisdom6-4, 1-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesBryson Choque vs Michael Garcia6-3, 7-6
L#2 DoublesJordan Christensen / Parker Hansen vs Weston Stutznegger / Armando Castro'3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesChris White / Christopher Johnson vs Alex Dalpe / William Roeca2-6, 6-7
2024-10-12vs Liberty Park Tennis-Arun/EischeidSplit 22
L#1 DoublesMitchell John / Chris White vs Adam Creer / Stefan Dancy4-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesJason McNeill vs Claudio Torres2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKasen Wright / Christopher Johnson vs Val Georgiev / Tony Mokhtarian1-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJordan Christensen / Nicholas Geer vs Arunnatesh Muthukkumaraswamy / Baovuong Nguyen6-2, 6-1
W#1 DoublesKasen Wright / Parker Hansen vs Ryan Fyfe / Donald MacMillan6-0, 6-4
L#1 SinglesJordan Christensen vs Matt Moench2-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesChris White / Christopher Johnson vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-09-28vs Liberty Park Tennis-Tsujino/CroweLost 13
L#1 DoublesMitchell John / Colby Pomeroy vs James Watson / Cameron Willes4-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesJason McNeill vs Jeff Meiling1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesChristopher Johnson / Chris White vs Benjamin Jagolinzer / Brady Patrick6-7, 1-6
W#3 DoublesNicholas Geer / Parker Hansen vs Andrew Bliss / CHRISTOPHER HO7-5, 6-2
2024-09-21vs Wasatch Hills-Atkin/RasmussenSplit 22
W#1 DoublesJordan Christensen / Parker Hansen vs Ike Anderson / Paul Gascoigne6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesKasen Wright vs Don Tran6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesMitchell John / Colby Pomeroy vs Gopal Chemiti / Ben Ginster6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesChris White / Bryson Choque vs Dario Pinet / RICK DILLWORTH4-6, 7-6, 0-1
2024-09-07vs Liberty Park Tennis-VorasaneWon 40
W#1 DoublesNicholas Geer / Kasen Wright vs Logan Casebolt / Matthew McDonald6-1, 6-2
W#1 SinglesBryson Choque vs Michael Perez7-6, 6-0
W#2 DoublesKyle Haas / Christopher Johnson vs Jay Taggart / Jordan Fong6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesJordan Christensen / Parker Hansen vs Christian Radman / Thomas Smith6-4, 7-5
2024-08-24vs Eccles Tennis Center-DalpeWon 30
W#1 DoublesMitchell John / Colby Pomeroy vs Justin Deputy / Matthew Wisdom6-4, 6-1
W#1 SinglesJordan Christensen vs Michael Garcia6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesKyle Haas / Christopher Johnson vs Prema Zipp / Jerad Amundsen6-1, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0M have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.68 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.98
Parker Hansen
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
3.85
Kasen Wright
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 4
3.77
Colby Pomeroy
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.72
Mitchell John
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.68
Kyle Haas
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.66
Jason McNeill
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
3.63
Jordan Christensen
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
3.53
Bryson Choque
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.53
Chris White
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.48
Nicholas Geer
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kasen Wright + Colby Pomeroy10266% games+12.9% vs expected
Jason McNeill + Nicholas Geer6554% games+5.7% vs expected
Mitchell John + Colby Pomeroy5258% games+5.6% vs expected
Nicholas Geer + Kasen Wright151552% games+3.4% vs expected
Chris White + Bryson Choque4549% games+3.4% vs expected
Nicholas Geer + Chris White281554% games+2.2% vs expected
Jordan Christensen + Nicholas Geer3254% games−1.2% vs expected
Chris White + Kasen Wright2744% games−1.7% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Parker Hansen
20W–11L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%55%45%
3.98
4
Kasen Wright
145W–133L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%88%12%
3.85
4
Colby Pomeroy
88W–53L career · 3 lines in 2024
2%94%4%
3.77
Mitchell John
19W–17L career · 4 lines in 2024
5%94%2%
3.72
Kyle Haas
41W–39L career · 2 lines in 2024
8%91%1%
3.68
4
Jason McNeill
42W–58L career · 2 lines in 2024
11%88%<1%
3.66
Jordan Christensen
25W–28L career · 6 lines in 2024
<1%15%85%
3.63
4
Bryson Choque
53W–82L career · 3 lines in 2024
41%59%<1%
3.53
4
Chris White
113W–152L career · 5 lines in 2024
41%59%<1%
3.53
Nicholas Geer
128W–105L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%55%45%
3.48

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.