← Teams

VTC-Ash

2021 Mixed 40 & Over · 6.0 Mixed

13 players · average NTRP 3.38 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.10 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.05
Amy Bucher
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
3.82
Nick Hooker
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
—
Christian Paulsen
published 3.5
—
Jane Paulsen
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
—
Lawrence Cooper
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.22
Julia Henry
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
3.14
Ryan Owens
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.07
Robert Glenn
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.82
Erik Bucher
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.79
Carol Glenn
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.77
Karin Owens
published 3
2.74
Nicola Ash
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.59
Michelle Ellett
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Results6 ties
2021-05-09Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesNicola Ash / Nick Hooker vs Betty Roux / Ed de la Fuente6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesCarol Glenn / Robert Glenn vs Cynthia Ross-Brockett / Ryan Ona4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMichelle Ellett / Lawrence Cooper vs Tina Kriebaum / Fred Sutardjo6-4, 6-3
2021-05-07Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesCarol Glenn / Robert Glenn vs Rebecca Arguello / James Lawrence6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesJane Paulsen / Lawrence Cooper vs Erin Doucet / Suresh Chand6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesJulia Henry / Erik Bucher vs Megan Clifford / Masafumi Inoue6-3, 4-5
2021-05-02Lost 1–2
W#1 DoublesNicola Ash / Nick Hooker vs Kayla Casebeer / MICHAEL DOHERTY6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesRyan Owens / Julia Henry vs Brooke Daniel / Fenn Bourland6-1, 6-3
L#3 DoublesErik Bucher / Jane Paulsen vs Tove Maloco / Jonathan Howe6-1, 6-3
2021-04-17Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesNicola Ash / Nick Hooker vs Matt Savage / Robin Burak6-3, 6-0
W#2 DoublesAmy Bucher / Lawrence Cooper vs Brad Johnson / Hoyun Barr6-2, 6-2
L#3 DoublesJane Paulsen / Ryan Owens vs Christina Bergstrom / Colin Looi7-6, 6-4
2021-04-11Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesLawrence Cooper / Amy Bucher vs Sev Flores / Debbie Spitzer3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesRobert Glenn / Carol Glenn vs Colin Sutherland / Michele Sutherland6-4, 7-6
L#3 DoublesNicola Ash / Erik Bucher vs Masafumi Inoue / Wanda Ng6-4, 6-0
2021-04-07Lost 1–2
W#1 DoublesNicola Ash / Nick Hooker vs Christina Bergstrom / Abhisar Gupta6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesCarol Glenn / Robert Glenn vs Virginia Martinez / Rodrigo Martinez4-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMichelle Ellett / Ryan Owens vs Patricia Nierenberg / Brad Johnson6-4, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4.5
Amy Bucher
179W–78L career
10%90%0%
4.05
4
Nick Hooker
194W–65L career
0%98%2%
3.82
3.5
Christian Paulsen
112W–67L career
not enough data
—
3.5
Jane Paulsen
84W–62L career
not enough data
—
3.5
Lawrence Cooper
80W–50L career
not enough data
—
3
Julia Henry
87W–52L career
0%18%82%
3.22
3.5
Ryan Owens
113W–77L career
6%94%0%
3.14
3.5
Robert Glenn
117W–113L career
14%86%0%
3.07
3
Erik Bucher
79W–60L career
0%98%1%
2.82
3
Carol Glenn
82W–81L career
0%99%1%
2.79
3
Karin Owens
82W–66L career
1%99%0%
2.77
3
Nicola Ash
114W–136L career
1%99%0%
2.74
3
Michelle Ellett
41W–39L career
21%79%0%
2.59

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.