Teams

ANTELOPE TA/ANTELOPE COMMUNITY PK 55AW7.0A

2025 ADULT 55&Over · Women 7.0

17 players · average NTRP 3.75 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2025-04-13vs RIDGE RC 55AW7.0AWon 20
W#1 DoublesAriane Sanders / Kelly Triplett vs Katharine Elliott / Terri Johannsen7-5, 6-0
W#2 DoublesTamara Jerd / Kathi Peterson vs Juli Kaplan / Helen Hansen6-2, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.23 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.79
Ariane Sanders
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.46
Vinh Sae
published
3.37
Marilyn Duncan
published
3.35
Kathi Peterson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.27
Rhona Wu
published
3.25
Rosalie Calabrese
published
3.22
Tamara Jerd
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.22
Nancy Kacey
published
3.20
Lee Yoshikawa
published
3.17
Linda Burke
published
3.17
Hee-Sook Koenig
published
3.13
Kat Beilby
published
3.10
Gabi Stallings
published
3.10
Carmel Lindner
published 3.5
3.01
Lisa Holverson
published
2.84
Marion Sanders
published
Ronnell Schuler
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Rhona Wu + Vinh Sae8651% games+6.8% vs expected
Rosalie Calabrese + Kathi Peterson5550% games+1.8% vs expected
Linda Burke + Lee Yoshikawa314 matchesnot enough data
Nancy Kacey + Tamara Jerd224 matchesnot enough data
Linda Burke + Marilyn Duncan123 matchesnot enough data
Ariane Sanders + Marion Sanders033 matchesnot enough data
Vinh Sae + Lee Yoshikawa213 matchesnot enough data
Kathi Peterson + Tamara Jerd213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Ariane Sanders
15W–19L career · 1 line in 2025
2%91%7%
3.79
Vinh Sae
14W–15L career · no lines in 2025
<1%61%39%
3.46
Marilyn Duncan
3W–8L career · no lines in 2025
<1%82%17%
3.37
Kathi Peterson
14W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
1%85%15%
3.35
Rhona Wu
13W–17L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.27
Rosalie Calabrese
14W–11L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%3%
3.25
Tamara Jerd
10W–14L career · 1 line in 2025
6%92%2%
3.22
Nancy Kacey
3W–6L career · no lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.22
Lee Yoshikawa
8W–12L career · no lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.20
Linda Burke
5W–8L career · no lines in 2025
11%88%1%
3.17
Hee-Sook Koenig
2W–1L career · no lines in 2025
11%88%1%
3.17
Kat Beilby
1W–7L career · no lines in 2025
17%82%<1%
3.13
Gabi Stallings
4W–11L career · no lines in 2025
23%76%<1%
3.10
3.5
Carmel Lindner
2W–8L career · no lines in 2025
25%75%<1%
3.10
Lisa Holverson
2W–7L career · no lines in 2025
46%54%<1%
3.01
Marion Sanders
13W–17L career · no lines in 2025
1%86%13%
2.84
Ronnell Schuler
7W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.