Teams

Elysium

2024 Winter Combo · 2024 Winter Combo 6.5 WOMEN Monday

17 players · average NTRP 3.11 / OHIO VALLEY

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-05-14vs Scarborough 3Split 11
W#1 DoublesJanine Keeler / Karen Heyob vs Heather Hunter / Laura Hollo4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesAnne Clark / Debbie Korcykoski vs Allison Kleinman / Isil Erel Koksal3-6, 1-6
2024-05-06vs Racquet Club 1Won 21
L#1 DoublesKaori Togawa / Qing Radebaugh vs Jessica Nimjee / MacKenzie Skellan6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesKaren Heyob / Rie Taniguchi vs Tristin Rausch / Cameron Smith7-6, 4-3
W#3 DoublesFederica Sommer / Janine Keeler vs Nadia Malik / Katherine Cain6-2, 6-3
2024-04-29vs WedgewoodWon 21
L#1 DoublesKaren Heyob / Amanda Mathis vs Abby McGill / Allison Wilson3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesKaori Togawa / Qing Radebaugh vs Heidi Baughman / Connie Schmidt6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesCynthia Humphry / Anne Clark vs Wendy Gibbons / Lisa Fiorentini6-2, 6-2
2024-04-22vs The Player's Club 2Lost 12
L#1 DoublesApril King / Lori Henry vs Katie Druhan / Stacy McIntire4-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesDiane Holland / Marsha Friedli vs Katie Burgess / Meredith Hulse6-2, 6-2
L#3 DoublesAnne Clark / Alison Dygert vs Amy Barger / Caroline Reinke4-6, 1-6
2024-04-15vs Olympic 2Lost 12
W#1 DoublesKaori Togawa / Rie Taniguchi vs Tiina Kekalainen / Krista Eckelman6-4, 6-5
L#2 DoublesFederica Sommer / Debbie Korcykoski vs Beth Houck / Heather Pliskin6-7, 3-4
L#3 DoublesJanine Keeler / Amy Sobotka vs Kaoru Wilson / Annelies Condon1-6, 4-6
2024-04-01vs Racquet Club 1Lost 03
L#1 DoublesFederica Sommer / Marsha Friedli vs Whitney Daffner / Joyce Ellerbrock2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesApril King / Amy Sobotka vs Megan Maas / Katherine Cain4-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesKaori Togawa / Rie Taniguchi vs Nadia Malik / Ashley Wilkins4-6, 5-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2024 Winter Combo 6.5 WOMEN Monday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.90 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.23
Janine Keeler
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.21
April King
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.13
Federica Sommer
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.11
Karen Heyob
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.08
Amanda Mathis
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.96
Toni Block
published
2.92
Amy Sobotka
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.88
Qing Radebaugh
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.81
Marsha Friedli
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.81
Cynthia Humphry
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Anne Clark
published 3
2.71
Debbie Korcykoski
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.68
Diane Holland
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.60
Lori Henry
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.45
Alison Dygert
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Kaori Togawa
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Rie Taniguchi
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lori Henry + Qing Radebaugh6163% games+12.9% vs expected
Lori Henry + Diane Holland9857% games+11.0% vs expected
April King + Cynthia Humphry4163% games+6.5% vs expected
April King + Amanda Mathis9262% games+6.4% vs expected
April King + Diane Holland3548% games+6.3% vs expected
Amy Sobotka + Federica Sommer5253% games+3.4% vs expected
Amanda Mathis + Toni Block401359% games+3.1% vs expected
Cynthia Humphry + Janine Keeler6260% games+2.8% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Janine Keeler
239W–121L career · 3 lines in 2024
4%94%2%
3.23
3.5
April King
107W–81L career · 2 lines in 2024
6%93%1%
3.21
3.5
Federica Sommer
71W–78L career · 3 lines in 2024
17%83%<1%
3.13
Karen Heyob
118W–99L career · 3 lines in 2024
19%80%<1%
3.11
3
Amanda Mathis
196W–84L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%28%72%
3.08
Toni Block
138W–82L career · no lines in 2024
<1%61%39%
2.96
3
Amy Sobotka
102W–85L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%74%26%
2.92
Qing Radebaugh
58W–35L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%81%19%
2.88
Marsha Friedli
102W–95L career · 2 lines in 2024
1%92%7%
2.81
3
Cynthia Humphry
169W–72L career · 1 line in 2024
1%92%7%
2.81
3
Anne Clark
5W–6L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
3
Debbie Korcykoski
140W–85L career · 2 lines in 2024
6%93%1%
2.71
3
Diane Holland
115W–101L career · 1 line in 2024
8%91%1%
2.68
Lori Henry
165W–149L career · 1 line in 2024
23%77%<1%
2.60
3
Alison Dygert
73W–69L career · 1 line in 2024
64%36%<1%
2.45
Kaori Togawa
5W–2L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
Rie Taniguchi
34W–27L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.