Teams

Stussie

2026 SPR TRI-Level · Mid 4.5

12 players · average NTRP 3.67 / CENTRAL ARIZONA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Mid 4.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.76 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.20
Lilla Nash
published
4.19
Katherine Shorey
published
4.17
Lindsey Henke
published
4.02
Hannah Thornsburg
published
3.95
Jaimi Foster
published
3.89
Kendall Hanks
published
3.77
Jacqueline Brauneis
published
3.77
Claire Corsmeier
published 4
3.55
Laurie Vuoto
published
3.29
Deborah Loss
published 3.5
3.27
Sofia Sebesta
published
3.01
Ann Stussie
published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Katherine Shorey + Lindsey Henke11657% games+13.6% vs expected
Jacqueline Brauneis + Claire Corsmeier6259% games+13.1% vs expected
Kendall Hanks + Jacqueline Brauneis6746% games−3.5% vs expected
Jaimi Foster + Ann Stussie5064% gamesnot enough data
Jaimi Foster + Jacqueline Brauneis044 matchesnot enough data
Ann Stussie + Hannah Thornsburg314 matchesnot enough data
Jacqueline Brauneis + Hannah Thornsburg134 matchesnot enough data
Kendall Hanks + Ann Stussie123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lilla Nash
3W–6L career · no lines in 2026
8%91%2%
4.20
Katherine Shorey
79W–14L career · no lines in 2026
<1%9%91%
4.19
Lindsey Henke
32W–20L career · no lines in 2026
12%87%1%
4.17
Hannah Thornsburg
71W–27L career · no lines in 2026
<1%44%56%
4.02
Jaimi Foster
43W–17L career · no lines in 2026
<1%65%35%
3.95
Kendall Hanks
137W–98L career · no lines in 2026
<1%<1%>99%
3.89
Jacqueline Brauneis
102W–112L career · no lines in 2026
3%92%5%
3.77
4
Claire Corsmeier
81W–54L career · no lines in 2026
3%92%5%
3.77
Laurie Vuoto
33W–56L career · no lines in 2026
36%64%<1%
3.55
3.5
Deborah Loss
23W–13L career · type S · no lines in 2026
2%91%7%
3.29
Sofia Sebesta
72W–87L career · no lines in 2026
3%92%5%
3.27
3.5
Ann Stussie
36W–101L career · no lines in 2026
46%54%<1%
3.01

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.