Teams

CACI RED

2022 TRIO - DEN · MEN 3.0 - TRIO

5 players · average NTRP 3.25 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2022-04-16vs CACM BLUESplit 11
L#1 DoublesDavid Gnabasik / Juan Crespin vs Dwight Smith / ARTHUR VAUGHN3-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesDavid Marks / Wayne Anderson vs Michael Kraft / David Kopp7-5, 6-7, 1-0
2022-04-09vs CCV REDLost 02
L#1 DoublesWayne Anderson / David Gnabasik vs Jason Abrams / Chad Mezvinsky2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#1 SinglesJuan Crespin vs Ilan Behm5-7, 1-6
2022-04-02vs WC REDLost 12
L#1 DoublesWayne Anderson / Edgar Silerio vs David Moreno / Pete Petrou3-6, 0-6
W#1 SinglesJuan Crespin vs Chase Adams6-2, 6-4
L#2 DoublesDavid Gnabasik / Stanley Pritchet vs Steve Pulver / Dan Lyons1-6, 2-6
2022-03-26vs WC GREENWon 21
L#1 DoublesWayne Anderson / Juan Crespin vs Michael Gagne / Brad Mosch3-6, 6-7
W#1 SinglesDavid Gnabasik vs Craig Masur6-3, 6-0
W#2 DoublesDavid Marks / Stanley Pritchet vs Whitney Schrandt / Jeff Milanovich6-2, 6-2
2022-03-19vs SKY REDWon 21
W#1 DoublesDavid Gnabasik / Edgar Silerio vs Scott Hermansen / Tim Godzich4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#1 SinglesWayne Anderson vs Steve Ferris4-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesDavid Marks / Stanley Pritchet vs John Bringenberg / Mark Jewell6-2, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 3.0 - TRIO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.66 estimated across 1 rated player. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

David Gnabasik
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
Edgar Silerio
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.66
Stanley Pritchet
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Juan Crespin
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Wayne Anderson
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 20% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Stanley Pritchet + Wayne Anderson31042% games−6.7% vs expected
Edgar Silerio + Wayne Anderson213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
David Gnabasik
8W–6L career · type S · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
3
Edgar Silerio
9W–14L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Stanley Pritchet
21W–29L career · 3 lines in 2022
11%88%<1%
2.66
Juan Crespin
4W–5L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Wayne Anderson
26W–31L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.