Teams

Hot Pookies-Sei

Coed Social League · 5.5

8 players · average NTRP 2.57 / NORTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2026-08-10vs Spice Girls (& Guys)-FernandezLost 03
L#1 Female DoublesCasey Babcock / Momo Rutkin vs Nina Feldman / Darcy Moynahan4-3
L#1 Female SinglesCasey Babcock vs Allison Wines1-6
L#1 Male SinglesWill Sather vs Tunde Adams4-4
2026-08-03vs Rally & Rosé-McCorkindaleLost 02
L#1 Female DoublesCasey Babcock / Cindy Li vs Lindsay Roitman / Julia Sommerfeld2-3
L#1 Female SinglesRoseanna Cen vs Tina Mccorkindale2-4
2026-07-27vs Summer Pookies-SeiWon 30
W#1 Female DoublesMomo Rutkin / Roseanna Cen vs Liz Speigel / Mila Burdan6-5
W#1 Male DoublesWill Sather / Randy Fan vs Blaine Allen / Kerem Oztelcan6-3
W#1 Male SinglesWill Sather vs Kerem Oztelcan6-2
2026-07-20vs Bagel Beagles-MendezWon 30
W#1 Female DoublesRoseanna Cen / Momo Rutkin vs Michelle Kim / Almita Magbalot6-4
W#1 Male DoublesWill Sather / Randy Fan vs Julio Mendez / Glenn Johnston6-2
W#1 Male SinglesWill Sather vs Julio Mendez6-0
2026-07-13vs Racket Scientists-UngureanasuLost 02
L#1 Female DoublesCindy Li / Casey Babcock vs Ioana Ungureanasu / Roxana Rautu1-6
L#1 Female SinglesMomo Rutkin vs Becca Mischke1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 5.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.32 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.83
Will Sather
usually #1 Male Singles 100% · published 3
2.43
Jennifer Sei
published 2.5
2.40
Randy Fan
usually #1 Male Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.26
Cindy Li
usually #1 Female Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.18
Roseanna Cen
usually #1 Female Doubles 67%, also #1 Female Singles 33% · published 2.5
2.11
Casey Babcock
usually #1 Female Doubles 67%, also #1 Female Singles 33% · published 2.5
2.02
Momo Rutkin
usually #1 Female Doubles 75%, also #1 Female Singles 25% · published 2.5
Russell Layng
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Momo Rutkin + Roseanna Cen213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Will Sather
13W–5L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
1%87%12%
2.83
2.5
Jennifer Sei
21W–21L career · no lines in 2026
0%68%32%
2.43
2.5
Randy Fan
14W–11L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%77%23%
2.40
2.5
Cindy Li
11W–7L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
0%96%4%
2.26
2.5
Roseanna Cen
18W–13L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%99%1%
2.18
2.5
Casey Babcock
3W–12L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.11
2.5
Momo Rutkin
9W–21L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.02
Russell Layng
1W–1L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.