← Teams

CRRC-Paulsen(s)

2019 Mixed 18 & Over · 6.0 Mixed

7 players · average NTRP 3.43 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.07 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.05
Amy Bucher
usually #2 Doubles 55%, also #1 Doubles 27% · published 4.5
—
Christian Paulsen
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
—
Jane Paulsen
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.14
Ryan Owens
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
2.82
Erik Bucher
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.77
Karin Owens
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 3
2.59
Michelle Ellett
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3
Results8 ties
2018-11-11Lost 0–3
L#1 DoublesChris Olmsted / Karin Owens vs Brandi Arness / Dennis Yalch6-3, 6-1
L#2 DoublesMichelle Ellett / Ryan Owens vs Michael Thomas / Tiffany Stewart7-5, 6-2
L#3 DoublesJane Paulsen / Erik Bucher vs Kevin Sullivan / Annie Chen6-1, 6-2
2018-10-27Won 2–1
L#1 DoublesJane Paulsen / Christian Paulsen vs Janine Wood / Steven Phillippi6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesRyan Owens / Michelle Ellett vs Todd Jacobson / Cathy Craner6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesKarin Owens / Chris Olmsted vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2018-10-20Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesErik Bucher / Amy Bucher vs Arron Heriford / Shonda Waxman6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesJane Paulsen / Christian Paulsen vs Sam Lumetta / Donna Kasabian6-3, 1-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesKarin Owens / Chris Olmsted vs Brian Patrick / Kerri Patrick6-2, 1-6, 1-0
2018-10-14Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesJane Paulsen / Christian Paulsen vs Megan Clifford / Devin McMasters6-2, 7-6
L#2 DoublesKarin Owens / Ryan Owens vs Wanda Ng / Kazuhito Tohnoe6-2, 6-4
W#3 DoublesAmy Bucher / Erik Bucher vs Susan Rolfe / Frank Brown2-6, 6-4, 1-0
2018-10-07Lost 0–3
L#1 DoublesAmy Bucher / Erik Bucher vs Andy Bracken / Parish Burns0-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesRyan Owens / Karin Owens vs Manuel Garcia-Fernandez / Casey Billings6-2, 6-3
L#3 DoublesChris Olmsted / Michelle Ellett vs Alix Leemin / Robert Hesslink6-1, 6-1
2018-09-30Lost 0–3
L#1 DoublesJane Paulsen / Christian Paulsen vs Janna McDougall / Shawn Boyce6-4, 6-0
L#2 DoublesErik Bucher / Amy Bucher vs Diane di Vito / Steven Harrison7-6, 6-4
L#3 DoublesChris Olmsted / Michelle Ellett vs Hoon Shin / Evelyn Sun6-1, 6-3
2018-09-23Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesRyan Owens / Karin Owens vs Paula Conway / Stefano Cavallucci6-0, 6-2
L#2 DoublesAmy Bucher / Erik Bucher vs Amy Carolan / Carlos Silvas6-4, 7-5
W#3 DoublesJane Paulsen / Christian Paulsen vs Kathleen Crowley / Gus Johnson2-6, 6-4, 1-0
2018-09-09Lost 0–3
L#1 DoublesJane Paulsen / Christian Paulsen vs Christopher Shaw / Sue Johnson7-6, 6-3
L#2 DoublesMichelle Ellett / Chris Olmsted vs Sue Piazza / Warren Olsen6-1, 6-1
L#3 DoublesRyan Owens / Karin Owens vs Todd Jacobson / Meg Anderson6-3, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4.5
Amy Bucher
179W–78L career
10%90%0%
4.05
3.5
Christian Paulsen
112W–67L career
not enough data
—
3.5
Jane Paulsen
84W–62L career
not enough data
—
3.5
Ryan Owens
113W–77L career
6%94%0%
3.14
3
Erik Bucher
79W–60L career
0%98%1%
2.82
3
Karin Owens
82W–66L career
1%99%0%
2.77
3
Michelle Ellett
41W–39L career
21%79%0%
2.59

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.