Teams

EFSC - Urban

2026 Brevard Combo 18 & Over · 6.5 Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.25 / REGION_4

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2026-08-24vs Fee - RouveyrolLost 03
L#1 DoublesAllison Moorhead / Cynthia Simmons vs Laura Rouveyrol / Mary Failla4-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesMelissa Lamp / Cyndi Mcdougall vs Brooke Maratta / Judy Beckler0-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesFaith Urban / Miriam Melendez vs Michelle Dunn / Janine Brunkala0-6, 0-6
2026-08-17vs Suntree - FordLost 01
L#2 DoublesSylvia Segura / Allison Moorhead vs Anastasia Mika / Mei Kalman3-6, 4-6
2026-08-10vs RCCB - VickersLost 01
L#1 DoublesKaryn Honaker / Lisa LeDoux vs Leslie Love / Katharyn Luer1-6, 6-2, 0-1
2026-08-03vs Viera Regional Park - HeltonSplit 11
L#2 DoublesSylvia Segura / Karyn Honaker vs Deena Helton / Karen Kelly4-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesLisa LeDoux / Cyndi Mcdougall vs Lori Abbott / Nancy Hastings6-1, 2-6, 1-0
2026-07-27vs EFSC - LeiterLost 02
L#2 DoublesFaith Urban / Lisa LeDoux vs Jacqueline Frank / Michelle Winterich2-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesMiriam Melendez / Suzanne Kube vs Trisha Watson / Julia Tulloch0-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.97 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.37
Lisa LeDoux
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.35
Marielle Earle
published
3.31
Sylvia Segura
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.21
Cynthia Simmons
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.04
Melissa Lamp
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.94
Suzanne Kube
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.80
Karyn Honaker
published
2.78
Miriam Melendez
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.72
Allison Moorhead
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.62
Cyndi Mcdougall
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.58
Faith Urban
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Miriam Melendez + Suzanne Kube4443% games−8.9% vs expected
Melissa Lamp + Lisa LeDoux123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Lisa LeDoux
166W–94L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%83%17%
3.37
Marielle Earle
5W–2L career · no lines in 2026
1%85%14%
3.35
Sylvia Segura
18W–24L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%90%9%
3.31
3.5
Cynthia Simmons
10W–11L career · 1 line in 2026
6%92%2%
3.21
Melissa Lamp
1W–5L career · 1 line in 2026
38%62%<1%
3.04
3
Suzanne Kube
117W–87L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%67%33%
2.94
Karyn Honaker
2W–11L career · no lines in 2026
2%91%7%
2.80
3.5
Miriam Melendez
47W–85L career · 2 lines in 2026
94%6%<1%
2.78
3
Allison Moorhead
11W–5L career · 1 line in 2026
6%92%2%
2.72
3
Cyndi Mcdougall
19W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
19%80%<1%
2.62
Faith Urban
11W–32L career · 2 lines in 2026
>99%<1%<1%
2.58

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.