Teams

Wells Gang

2022 Mixed 40 and Over League · 7.0

11 players · average NTRP 3.44 / MAUI

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2022-08-27vs Mike 7.0 #1Won 10
W#2 DoublesDavid Raatz / Tania Kellermeyer vs Kevin Kato / Jane Sakakihara6-4, 6-4
2022-08-07vs Mike 7.0 #3Won 20
W#2 DoublesDonald Chaikin / Clarita Balala vs Michael Kinoshita / Carol Lam6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesClarence Kenui / Ann Marugaki vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-07-30vs Mike 7.0 #2Lost 02
L#2 DoublesDavid Raatz / Elise Moniz vs Christopher Smith / Pamela Dolin2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesTroy Katafias / Ann Marugaki vs Alton Watanabe / Cynthia Sawyer0-6, 1-6
2022-07-24vs Mike 7.0 #3Won 20
W#2 DoublesAnn Marugaki / David Raatz vs James Bendon / Kathe Schindler6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesElise Moniz / Clarence Kenui vs Ray van Dijk / Lore Lee Robello7-5, 6-7, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.21 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.63
Rowena Nikki Baysa
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.29
Clarita Balala
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
Elise Moniz
published 3.5
3.24
Clarence Kenui
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.19
Ann Marugaki
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.17
Chris Morakis
published 3.5
3.17
Tania Kellermeyer
published
3.16
Gary Oshiro
published 3.5
3.09
David Raatz
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.92
Donald Chaikin
published 3
Panna Cappelli
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

David Raatz + Ann Marugaki7063% games+17.0% vs expected
Clarita Balala + David Raatz8166% games+16.1% vs expected
Clarita Balala + Clarence Kenui10755% games+5.3% vs expected
Rowena Nikki Baysa + David Raatz5257% games+3.9% vs expected
Tania Kellermeyer + Chris Morakis1441% games+0.7% vs expected
Elise Moniz + David Raatz1544% games−3.7% vs expected
Donald Chaikin + Ann Marugaki1640% games−5.9% vs expected
Gary Oshiro + Ann Marugaki3540% games−7.7% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Rowena Nikki Baysa
90W–48L career · 2 lines in 2022
16%84%<1%
3.63
3.5
Clarita Balala
118W–101L career · 4 lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.29
3.5
Elise Moniz
27W–33L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Clarence Kenui
65W–33L career · 2 lines in 2022
3%95%2%
3.24
3.5
Ann Marugaki
75W–74L career · 3 lines in 2022
7%92%1%
3.19
3.5
Chris Morakis
34W–30L career · no lines in 2022
9%90%1%
3.17
Tania Kellermeyer
42W–63L career · no lines in 2022
10%90%1%
3.17
3.5
Gary Oshiro
50W–50L career · no lines in 2022
12%88%<1%
3.16
3.5
David Raatz
101W–110L career · 3 lines in 2022
24%76%<1%
3.09
3
Donald Chaikin
18W–42L career · type A · no lines in 2022
<1%74%26%
2.92
Panna Cappelli
2W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.