Teams

YTC-Team Smart Ace

2024 Coed One Weekend League · 8.0

6 players · average NTRP 3.92 / EASTERN WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2024-09-29vs CBRC-Smarter Not HarderWon 31
W#1 Female DoublesStacy Stephen / Dawn Degrasse vs Lisa Chapman / Maria Uy6-3
L#1 Female SinglesDaphne Reilly vs Dagney Markle3-6
W#1 Male DoublesKelly Richelderfer / James Degrasse vs Jason Chapman / Morgan Neal6-4
W#2 Mixed DoublesStacy Stephen / Scott Stephen vs Scott Dowson / Lisa Chapman6-5
2024-09-28vs YTC-RustWon 32
L#1 Female DoublesDawn Degrasse / Daphne Reilly vs Stephanie Flowers / Nancy Livingston1-6
L#1 Female SinglesDawn Degrasse vs Rebecca Stewart Rust3-6
W#1 Male DoublesTimothy Miller / Kelly Richelderfer vs Ryan Franklin / Raymond Rust Jr6-2
W#1 Mixed DoublesStacy Stephen / Kelly Richelderfer vs Gena Franklin / Ryan Franklin6-2
W#2 Mixed DoublesJames Degrasse / Daphne Reilly vs Raymond Rust Jr / Cynthia Kimel6-2
2024-09-28vs PC-HolleWon 31
W#1 Female DoublesDawn Degrasse / Stacy Stephen vs Jill Montgomery / Kristin Ruedel6-2
W#1 Female SinglesDaphne Reilly vs Dana Holle6-0
L#1 Male DoublesJames Degrasse / Scott Stephen vs Adam Hrebeniuk / Austen Hebdon3-6
W#1 Male SinglesKelly Richelderfer vs Bryce Richardson6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.58 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.90
Daphne Reilly
usually #1 Female Singles 67%, also #1 Female Doubles 33% · published 4
3.89
Kelly Richelderfer
usually #1 Male Doubles 67%, also #1 Male Singles 33% · published 4
3.55
Dawn Degrasse
usually #1 Female Doubles 67%, also #1 Female Singles 33% · published 4
3.52
Stacy Stephen
usually #1 Female Doubles 67%, also #1 Mixed Doubles 33% · published 4
3.45
James Degrasse
usually #1 Male Doubles 67%, also #2 Mixed Doubles 33% · published 4
3.17
Scott Stephen
usually #1 Male Doubles 50%, also #2 Mixed Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Dawn Degrasse + Kelly Richelderfer8061% games+9.7% vs expected
James Degrasse + Stacy Stephen224 matchesnot enough data
Stacy Stephen + Kelly Richelderfer314 matchesnot enough data
Dawn Degrasse + James Degrasse033 matchesnot enough data
Dawn Degrasse + Stacy Stephen213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Daphne Reilly
40W–19L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%77%23%
3.90
4
Kelly Richelderfer
59W–33L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%79%21%
3.89
4
Dawn Degrasse
88W–115L career · 3 lines in 2024
35%65%<1%
3.55
4
Stacy Stephen
70W–78L career · 3 lines in 2024
44%56%<1%
3.52
4
James Degrasse
34W–82L career · 3 lines in 2024
65%35%<1%
3.45
3.5
Scott Stephen
59W–55L career · 2 lines in 2024
10%90%1%
3.17

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.