Teams

LOS GATOS SR CW9.5A

2025 COMBO · Women 9.5

20 players · average NTRP 4.64 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-10-20vs FOOTHILLS TandS CW9.5ALost 12
L#1 DoublesKristen Juhan / Emese Erdos vs Alena Pruett / Sumeeta Vasishta2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesAtsuko Saito / Tara Garneau vs Tina Baykaner / Nicole Schnabel4-6, 6-1, 0-1
W#3 DoublesDolores Podesta / Peggy Schatzman vs Veeraya Pupatwibul / Winnie Zhang6-1, 6-3
2025-10-05vs FOOTHILLS TandS CW9.5AWon 21
W#1 DoublesDaisy Hurst / Peggy Schatzman vs Velislava Balin / Karen Cannon7-6, 6-4
L#2 DoublesRobyn Girard / Denise Hartfield vs Veeraya Pupatwibul / Winnie Zhang2-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesKristen Juhan / Emese Erdos vs Lynette van Dell / Kathy Leung-Mah6-2, 6-2
2025-08-27vs FOOTHILLS TandS CW9.5AWon 21
W#1 DoublesAtsuko Saito / Tara Garneau vs Adeeti Ullal / Sharon Yang6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesRobyn Girard / Denise Alberto vs Qingqing Zong / Nicole Schnabel4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJoana Sun / Allison Bartlett vs Morgan Bricca / Veeraya Pupatwibul2-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 9.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.27 estimated across 17 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.84
Atsuko Saito
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 5
4.61
Daisy Hurst
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 5
4.55
Allison Bartlett
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.47
Maiko Yano
published
4.46
Kristen Juhan
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
4.44
Denise Alberto
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.40
Dolores Podesta
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Ayano Oda
published 4.5
4.22
Robyn Girard
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
4.21
Peggy Schatzman
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
4.18
Kyoko Hubbard
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
4.17
Marybeth Gonzales
published
4.14
Denise Hartfield
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.12
Christine Dumery
published 4.5
4.10
Tara Garneau
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
4.08
Emese Erdos
usually #1 Doubles 38%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published
3.84
Donna Kaneko
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.75
Maisun Totah
published
Gwenaelle Mille
published
Joana Sun
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tara Garneau + Denise Hartfield5163% gamesnot enough data
Denise Hartfield + Denise Alberto404 matchesnot enough data
Atsuko Saito + Maiko Yano303 matchesnot enough data
Maisun Totah + Donna Kaneko123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Atsuko Saito
15W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
no projection at this level
4.84
5
Daisy Hurst
8W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
no projection at this level
4.61
4.5
Allison Bartlett
20W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%36%64%
4.55
Maiko Yano
11W–6L career · no lines in 2025
<1%57%43%
4.47
Kristen Juhan
4W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
no projection at this level
4.46
4.5
Denise Alberto
18W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%65%34%
4.44
Dolores Podesta
13W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%76%24%
4.40
4.5
Ayano Oda
1W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Robyn Girard
11W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
no projection at this level
4.22
Peggy Schatzman
7W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
7%91%2%
4.21
Kyoko Hubbard
14W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
9%89%1%
4.18
Marybeth Gonzales
1W–9L career · no lines in 2025
12%87%1%
4.17
4.5
Denise Hartfield
17W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
16%84%1%
4.14
4.5
Christine Dumery
1W–9L career · no lines in 2025
19%81%<1%
4.12
Tara Garneau
11W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
24%76%<1%
4.10
Emese Erdos
17W–20L career · 8 lines in 2025
28%72%<1%
4.08
Donna Kaneko
10W–28L career · 3 lines in 2025
87%13%<1%
3.84
Maisun Totah
4W–6L career · no lines in 2025
97%3%<1%
3.75
Gwenaelle Mille
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Joana Sun
1W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.