Teams

ZEPHYR COVE 40AW3.5A

2024 ADULT 40&Over - Reno · Women's 3.5

13 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-11-04vs RENO TENNIS CENTER 40AW3.5ALost 01
L#1 DoublesMiriam DeQuadros / Kristy Wertz vs Mahnoush Bagheri / Sheri Faircloth2-6, 4-6
2023-10-27vs CAUGHLIN 40AW3.5ALost 01
L#3 DoublesCarolyn Wright / Cecille Florentino vs Debbie Morgan / Lynn Bodfish5-7, 7-6, 0-1
2023-10-08vs TAHOE DONNER 40AW3.5ALost 01
L#2 DoublesCarolyn Wright / Melanie Lyons vs Heather Brown / Pia Moore3-6, 6-7
2023-09-29vs RENO TENNIS CENTER 40AW3.5BWon 10
W#3 DoublesRhoda Shaponik / Carolyn Wright vs Carol Herzberg / Donnelyn Curtis6-1, 6-2
2023-09-24vs SOUTH RENO TENNIS 40AW3.5ASplit 11
W#1 SinglesMiriam DeQuadros vs Carol Britton7-5, 7-6
L#2 DoublesRhoda Shaponik / Carolyn Wright vs Stacie Griffin / Andrea Knapp Nolan2-6, 6-4, 0-1
2023-09-09vs SOUTH RENO TENNIS 40AW3.5ALost 01
L#1 DoublesMiriam DeQuadros / Cheri Von Bargen vs Lisa Fore / Gina Harris6-7, 3-6
2023-08-26vs CAUGHLIN 40AW3.5ALost 01
L#1 SinglesMiriam DeQuadros vs Jennifer Mann7-5, 3-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women's 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.25 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.77
Cheri Von Bargen
published 4
3.51
Miriam DeQuadros
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.49
Kristy Wertz
published
3.37
Shelley Lober
published
3.28
Rhoda Shaponik
published
3.27
Melinda Choy
published
3.24
Tamara Crawford
published
3.16
Carolyn Wright
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.12
Deniece Mailloux
published 3.5
3.07
Cecille Florentino
published 3.5
2.98
Eileen Forster
published 3.5
2.71
Barbara Cooper
published 3
Mary Evans
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Cheri Von Bargen
11W–0L career · no lines in 2024
2%94%4%
3.77
Miriam DeQuadros
126W–100L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%46%54%
3.51
Kristy Wertz
11W–4L career · no lines in 2024
<1%54%46%
3.49
Shelley Lober
13W–17L career · no lines in 2024
<1%85%15%
3.37
Rhoda Shaponik
0W–5L career · no lines in 2024
96%4%<1%
3.28
Melinda Choy
5W–5L career · no lines in 2024
2%94%4%
3.27
Tamara Crawford
11W–3L career · no lines in 2024
3%95%2%
3.24
3.5
Carolyn Wright
93W–84L career · 4 lines in 2024
11%88%<1%
3.16
3.5
Deniece Mailloux
3W–3L career · no lines in 2024
17%82%<1%
3.12
3.5
Cecille Florentino
3W–5L career · no lines in 2024
30%70%<1%
3.07
3.5
Eileen Forster
2W–8L career · no lines in 2024
57%43%<1%
2.98
3
Barbara Cooper
6W–12L career · no lines in 2024
5%94%1%
2.71
Mary Evans
1W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.