Teams

SGraff.40.3.0-DUR

2026 Eno River Mixed 40 & Over · 40 & Over Mixed 3.0

14 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-07-29vs NLetts-UNCLost 12
L#1 DoublesMatthew Feldt / Sara Lawrence vs Lindsey Gouker / Josh Gouker - (DQ)6-3, 6-7, 0-1
L#2 DoublesLeslie Jackson / Terrence Hawkins vs Meng Chen / Vera Halpern2-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesKari Lovetinsky / Keith Buckel vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2026-07-22vs LGilchrist-CHCCSplit 11
L#1 DoublesKristin Isaacs / Tom Luben vs Aaron Meadows / Jessica Meadows6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesKeith Buckel / Susan Graff vs Elizabeth Faber / Buck Phillips6-2, 4-6, 1-0
2026-07-15vs TEdwards-HSLost 03
L#1 DoublesSara Lawrence / Matthew Feldt vs Mike Kempel / Mary Macdonald1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesKinsey Wennerstrom / Keith Buckel vs David Evert / Altagracia Evert2-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesDanette Pachtner / Jeff Russell vs Dirk Kumashiro / Tynita Edwards1-6, 4-6
2026-07-08vs MBland-CHTCWon 30
W#1 DoublesMatthew Feldt / Sara Lawrence vs Mark Bland / Tracy Kinsey6-3, 7-6
W#2 DoublesLeon Grodski Barrera / Kristin Isaacs vs John Hess / Maribeth Hamilton6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesKari Lovetinsky / Rafael DeJesus vs Franck Seguin / Mary Griffiths6-2, 3-6, 1-0
2026-07-02vs YDeaver-DURWon 21
W#1 DoublesLeslie Jackson / Terrence Hawkins vs Jennifer Magee / FJ Magee6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesTom Luben / Susan Graff vs Yolanda Deaver / David Bautz1-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesLeon Grodski Barrera / Kari Lovetinsky vs Tammy Hood / Lloyd Calhoun6-4, 7-6
2026-06-24vs JYoung.40-DURWon 30
W#1 DoublesTom Luben / Leslie Jackson vs Carl Laird / Amanda Laird3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesRafael DeJesus / Sara Lawrence vs Annaliese Gresham / Will Gresham6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesTerrence Hawkins / Abigail Weaver vs Bill Schaller / Susan Parent6-1, 6-1
2026-06-17vs AHabib-HRLost 03
L#1 DoublesKari Lovetinsky / Matthew Feldt vs Connie Brown / Brian Reo4-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesKinsey Wennerstrom / Tom Luben vs Karen Sonders / Ashraf Habib7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesKristin Isaacs / Leon Grodski Barrera vs Melanie Wall / George Corbett2-6, 7-5, 0-1
2026-06-10vs NLetts-UNCWon 21
L#1 DoublesMatthew Feldt / Abigail Weaver vs Julia Haslett / Christopher Fioretti1-6, 6-1, 0-1
W#2 DoublesTom Luben / Susan Graff vs Mia Pizzagalli / Meng Chen7-5, 6-4
W#3 DoublesRafael DeJesus / Kinsey Wennerstrom vs Sara Knechtel / Brett Bushnell6-4, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40 & Over Mixed 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.88 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.06
Matthew Feldt
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.05
Sara Lawrence
usually #2 Doubles 38%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published 3
3.05
Abigail Weaver
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
3.03
Kinsey Wennerstrom
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.94
Susan Graff
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
2.82
Terrence Hawkins
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.81
Kari Lovetinsky
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.80
Kristin Isaacs
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.79
Leon Grodski Barrera
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.79
Tom Luben
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 3
2.79
Danette Pachtner
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.63
Keith Buckel
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
Jeff Russell
published
Rafael DeJesus
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sara Lawrence + Matthew Feldt1445% gamesnot enough data
Kinsey Wennerstrom + Tom Luben314 matchesnot enough data
Kari Lovetinsky + Keith Buckel213 matchesnot enough data
Kristin Isaacs + Leon Grodski Barrera213 matchesnot enough data
Kristin Isaacs + Tom Luben123 matchesnot enough data
Susan Graff + Tom Luben123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Matthew Feldt
16W–18L career · 8 lines in 2026
<1%35%65%
3.06
3
Sara Lawrence
160W–120L career · 8 lines in 2026
<1%37%63%
3.05
3
Abigail Weaver
13W–18L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%37%63%
3.05
3
Kinsey Wennerstrom
127W–103L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%42%58%
3.03
Susan Graff
27W–23L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%67%33%
2.94
Terrence Hawkins
7W–4L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%89%10%
2.82
3
Kari Lovetinsky
116W–121L career · 6 lines in 2026
1%90%9%
2.81
3
Kristin Isaacs
111W–164L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%90%8%
2.80
3
Leon Grodski Barrera
106W–89L career · 3 lines in 2026
2%91%7%
2.79
3
Tom Luben
85W–115L career · 7 lines in 2026
2%91%7%
2.79
3
Danette Pachtner
32W–35L career · 1 line in 2026
2%91%7%
2.79
3
Keith Buckel
53W–93L career · 3 lines in 2026
19%81%<1%
2.63
Jeff Russell
1W–1L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Rafael DeJesus
3W–0L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.