Teams

Lagoon - Strickland - 3.0 - 40 - Day - Fall

2024 · 2025 Fall USTA Adult 40 & Over Day League - Montgomery

12 players · average NTRP 2.75 / ALABAMA

View scouting list →
Flight standings2 teams · 2025 Fall USTA Adult 40 & Over Day League - Montgomery
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Lagoon - Strickland - 3.0 - 40 - Day - Fall53221840302
2Lagoon - Sellers - 3.0 - 40 - Day - Fall35182252376

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.71 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.06
Karen Steineker
published
3.05
Patricia Watts
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Singles 14% · published
2.77
Betsey Johns
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 13% · published 3
2.70
Lori Milner
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.68
Linda Pugh
published
2.66
Julie Knight
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
2.64
Jewell Pitts
usually #3 Doubles 73%, also #1 Doubles 9% · published
2.50
Cheryl Bollinger
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #4 Doubles 22% · published 2.5
2.37
Kay Cannady
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Carolyn Strickland
published
Melissa McDaniel
published
Valerie Smedley
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Betsey Johns + Patricia Watts3448% games−2.6% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Karen Steineker
28W–9L career · no lines in 2025
<1%32%68%
3.06
Patricia Watts
23W–26L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%36%64%
3.05
3
Betsey Johns
19W–41L career · 8 lines in 2025
2%94%4%
2.77
Lori Milner
2W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
6%93%1%
2.70
Linda Pugh
6W–5L career · no lines in 2025
8%91%1%
2.68
Julie Knight
35W–44L career · 8 lines in 2025
11%88%<1%
2.66
Jewell Pitts
9W–41L career · 11 lines in 2025
14%86%<1%
2.64
2.5
Cheryl Bollinger
7W–22L career · 9 lines in 2025
0%51%49%
2.50
Kay Cannady
9W–35L career · 3 lines in 2025
85%15%<1%
2.37
Carolyn Strickland
2W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Melissa McDaniel
2W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Valerie Smedley
3W–14L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.