Teams

TTC - Taylor 18 3.5

2024 Tuscaloosa USTA Adult Spring-Weeknight 18&over · 3.5 Adult Men-Weeknight

13 players · average NTRP 3.75 / ALABAMA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 3.5 Adult Men-Weeknight have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.34 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Alex Barber
published 4
3.65
Douglas Klutz
published 4
3.44
Maximilian Hammond
published
3.43
Steve Buchheit
published
3.42
Hudson Hatfield
published 4
3.33
Reid Ketchum
published
3.31
Matthew Hammond
published
Barry Payne
published 3.5
Duncan Mathews
published 3.5
3.25
Russell Johnson
published
3.18
Aidan Higgins
published 3.5
3.02
Roman Duren
published
Porter Buchheit
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Matthew Hammond + Steve Buchheit6650% games+7.4% vs expected
Maximilian Hammond + Matthew Hammond2740% games−2.7% vs expected
Russell Johnson + Matthew Hammond134 matchesnot enough data
Alex Barber + Douglas Klutz213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Alex Barber
3W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
4
Douglas Klutz
13W–16L career · type A · no lines in 2024
12%88%<1%
3.65
Maximilian Hammond
8W–19L career · no lines in 2024
67%33%<1%
3.44
Steve Buchheit
31W–24L career · no lines in 2024
<1%70%30%
3.43
4
Hudson Hatfield
17W–18L career · no lines in 2024
74%26%<1%
3.42
Reid Ketchum
21W–12L career · no lines in 2024
1%90%9%
3.33
Matthew Hammond
27W–35L career · no lines in 2024
1%92%7%
3.31
3.5
Barry Payne
0W–4L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
3.5
Duncan Mathews
1W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Russell Johnson
19W–46L career · no lines in 2024
97%3%<1%
3.25
3.5
Aidan Higgins
5W–7L career · no lines in 2024
8%91%1%
3.18
Roman Duren
9W–17L career · no lines in 2024
44%56%<1%
3.02
Porter Buchheit
0W–4L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.