Teams

Jackie Theobald

2022 FALL FLEX SINGLES · Women 3.0

1 player · average NTRP 3.00 / IDAHO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Flight standings21 teams · Women 3.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Story Holston5151224
2Tor Lynn4242455
3Michele Surmelis46461277
4Brittany Smith474715102
5Ashley Snyder2323645
6Kirsten Nickisch2323752
7Lyn McArthur25251166
8Rachel Smith26261383
9Jackie Theobald27271596
10Karen Dickerson1313638
11Alyce Brown15151062
12Lori Head15151067
13Erin Hobbs15151069
14Poppy Short17171486
15Heather Farnsworth17171489
16Angela Hatch0101212
17Sara Last0101212
18Kelly Wathne0202424
19Holly Young05051060
20Kate Roper05051061
21Amity Miller05051062

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Jackie Theobald
published 3
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Jackie Theobald
24W–34L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.